<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: cisco suing apple over iphone trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/</link>
	<description>gadgets, gizmos, games, cool gadgets, geeky gadgets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:39:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ManChicken</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>ManChicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Nonsense.  Cisco should only enforce their trademark to avoid confusion in the marketplace.  The &quot;right&quot; to protect intellectual property is based more on flawwed business models and corporate fascism that seeks to restrict the rights of people for the sake of their own profit.  Nothing more, nothing less.

Nobody has the right to control another human being for the sake of monetary gain.  Ever.  Cisco should enforce trademark to avoid confusion only.

If Cisco really posted that here (not sure), then shame on them for attempting to subversively control the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense.  Cisco should only enforce their trademark to avoid confusion in the marketplace.  The &#8220;right&#8221; to protect intellectual property is based more on flawwed business models and corporate fascism that seeks to restrict the rights of people for the sake of their own profit.  Nothing more, nothing less.</p>
<p>Nobody has the right to control another human being for the sake of monetary gain.  Ever.  Cisco should enforce trademark to avoid confusion only.</p>
<p>If Cisco really posted that here (not sure), then shame on them for attempting to subversively control the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; cisco suing apple over iphone trademark</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Gadgets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; cisco suing apple over iphone trademark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/#comment-743</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more at gadgets, games, gizmos and weird science &#195;?&#194;&#187; [technabob]   &#171; 5 Reasons I will NOT buy an iPhone  my next phone candidate &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more at gadgets, games, gizmos and weird science &Atilde;?&Acirc;&raquo; [technabob]   &laquo; 5 Reasons I will NOT buy an iPhone  my next phone candidate &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Earnhardt</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>John Earnhardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/01/10/cisco-suing-apple-over-iphone-trademark/#comment-742</guid>
		<description>CISCO&#039;S iPHONE TRADEMARK - Intellectual property is the lifeblood of Silicon Valley and we all have to protect our property.  The iPhone trademark is owned by Cisco, as noted in your story.  We (Cisco) had hoped to reach an agreement to share our trademark with Apple, yet they decided to use the name without our agreement, so we, unfortunately, are having to go to court to stop them from using the name.  This issue is not about money.  We still hope we can reach an agreement, but when your neighbor steals your property, you have no recourse other than to call the cops and file a complaint.  Full Cisco statement at: http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/corp_011007.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CISCO&#8217;S iPHONE TRADEMARK &#8211; Intellectual property is the lifeblood of Silicon Valley and we all have to protect our property.  The iPhone trademark is owned by Cisco, as noted in your story.  We (Cisco) had hoped to reach an agreement to share our trademark with Apple, yet they decided to use the name without our agreement, so we, unfortunately, are having to go to court to stop them from using the name.  This issue is not about money.  We still hope we can reach an agreement, but when your neighbor steals your property, you have no recourse other than to call the cops and file a complaint.  Full Cisco statement at: <a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/corp_011007.html" rel="nofollow">http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/corp_011007.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
