<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: sanyo xacti claims worlds smallest 1080p camcorder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/</link>
	<description>cool gadgets, gizmos, games and geeky gadgets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:10:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: technabob</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/comment-page-1/#comment-2582</link>
		<dc:creator>technabob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/#comment-2582</guid>
		<description>I must have misread the original specs. It looks like there is full 60 frame per second support at 720p, but not at 1080. Still, the compression artifacts sound awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have misread the original specs. It looks like there is full 60 frame per second support at 720p, but not at 1080. Still, the compression artifacts sound awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tryagain</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/comment-page-1/#comment-2583</link>
		<dc:creator>tryagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/#comment-2583</guid>
		<description>No this cannot record 60 frames/sec at full 1080 resolution.  It can record only 60 FIELDS/second.  This is yet another INTERLACED camcorder.

Also the bandwidth is so limited that any subject motion or worse camera motion results in horrific compression artifacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No this cannot record 60 frames/sec at full 1080 resolution.  It can record only 60 FIELDS/second.  This is yet another INTERLACED camcorder.</p>
<p>Also the bandwidth is so limited that any subject motion or worse camera motion results in horrific compression artifacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raluca</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/comment-page-1/#comment-2581</link>
		<dc:creator>Raluca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 22:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/30/sanyo-xacti-claims-worlds-smallest-1080p-camcorder/#comment-2581</guid>
		<description>The SANYO Xacti HD1000 will be available in the U.S.A. in September, 2007, and has an MSRP of $799.99. ;) No too much waiting :) Will be on Amazon on October 5, 2007</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SANYO Xacti HD1000 will be available in the U.S.A. in September, 2007, and has an MSRP of $799.99. <img src='http://technabob.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  No too much waiting <img src='http://technabob.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Will be on Amazon on October 5, 2007</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
