<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: weighted companion cube pc: where have you been? [casemod]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/2008/01/21/weighted-companion-cube-pc-where-have-you-been-casemod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/01/21/weighted-companion-cube-pc-where-have-you-been-casemod/</link>
	<description>cool gadgets, games, gizmos and weird science</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/01/21/weighted-companion-cube-pc-where-have-you-been-casemod/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2008/01/21/weighted-companion-cube-pc-where-have-you-been-casemod/#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>Hmm... I doubt that thing can play portal very well. I don't doubt it can _play_ it, but a 1.5 Ghz processor is not exactly insane plus the fact that the video card would have to be PCI. Still, great work on the case.

It would have been better if it was life size and more powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I doubt that thing can play portal very well. I don&#8217;t doubt it can _play_ it, but a 1.5 Ghz processor is not exactly insane plus the fact that the video card would have to be PCI. Still, great work on the case.</p>
<p>It would have been better if it was life size and more powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
