Comments on: Gucci Men’s Watches Go Digital [Fancy Schmancy] http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/ Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Geek Stuff Sat, 26 May 2012 17:05:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: PUSPENDU MAITY http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-50060 PUSPENDU MAITY Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:24:54 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-50060 which price?????? which price??????

]]> By: Fausto http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-47872 Fausto Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:43:16 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-47872 I love Gucci watches! I especially like that red one! Wonder how much it costs I love Gucci watches! I especially like that red one! Wonder how much it costs

]]> By: Armand http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-44846 Armand Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:40:00 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-44846 it´s very nice howe much? it´s very nice howe much?

]]> By: emina http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-44203 emina Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:53:31 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-44203 can you please tell me how to find this analog watch. is that the same watch that can use digital and analog option or they are different? hope to get ur answer regards emina can you please tell me how to find this analog watch.
is that the same watch that can use digital and analog option or they are different?
hope to get ur answer
regards
emina

]]> By: ニセモノ http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-43585 ニセモノ Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:45:54 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-43585 My name is replica from tokyo. I am interested in your writing. Some of your posting are good, I can say, best. Can you please tell me how to subscribe to your blog post online? <a href="http://www.replicajp.com" rel="nofollow">ニセモノ</a> My name is replica from tokyo. I am interested in your writing. Some of your posting are good, I can say, best. Can you please tell me how to subscribe to your blog post online?

ニセモノ

]]> By: allan agustin http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-37928 allan agustin Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:32:10 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-37928 how much is this gucci?? and for shipping? how much is this gucci?? and for shipping?

]]> By: Adam http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-19306 Adam Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:15:22 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-19306 Not another digital watch using seven segment displays. A $10 cell phone has a better looking time display using a dot matrix display and attractive fonts. Why does this $1300 gucci look like a POS timex? Not another digital watch using seven segment displays. A $10 cell phone has a better looking time display using a dot matrix display and attractive fonts. Why does this $1300 gucci look like a POS timex?

]]> By: dps http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/comment-page-1/#comment-3685 dps Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:54:48 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/2008/02/22/gucci-mens-watches-go-digital-fancy-schmancy/#comment-3685 I bought a watch that has a STRIKINGLY similar face at walmart a few years ago. seriously gucci? seriously? I bought a watch that has a STRIKINGLY similar face at walmart a few years ago.

seriously gucci?

seriously?

]]>