<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: nasa urine recycler is good to go. unfortunately.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/2008/11/30/nasa-urine-recycler-is-good-to-go-unfortunately/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/11/30/nasa-urine-recycler-is-good-to-go-unfortunately/</link>
	<description>cool gadgets, gizmos, games and geeky gadgets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:58:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarreq Teryx</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/11/30/nasa-urine-recycler-is-good-to-go-unfortunately/comment-page-1/#comment-17176</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarreq Teryx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=5604#comment-17176</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this thing about 10 years ago on Beyond Tomorrow (or Beyond 2000, whichever it was called at the time), the output is 100&#37; pure water and totally drinkable.

conceptually though, yes it is a turn off, but it&#039;s lighter than carrying enough water for a multi-week to multi-year space mission, now isn&#039;t it?

and also, it would be good for arid regions, or on mars or the moon.&#8195;so conceptually icky or not, it is a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this thing about 10 years ago on Beyond Tomorrow (or Beyond 2000, whichever it was called at the time), the output is 100&#37; pure water and totally drinkable.</p>
<p>conceptually though, yes it is a turn off, but it&#8217;s lighter than carrying enough water for a multi-week to multi-year space mission, now isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>and also, it would be good for arid regions, or on mars or the moon.&#8195;so conceptually icky or not, it is a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burns</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/11/30/nasa-urine-recycler-is-good-to-go-unfortunately/comment-page-1/#comment-17174</link>
		<dc:creator>Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=5604#comment-17174</guid>
		<description>ewwww</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ewwww</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manchicken</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/11/30/nasa-urine-recycler-is-good-to-go-unfortunately/comment-page-1/#comment-17136</link>
		<dc:creator>manchicken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=5604#comment-17136</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting.  I think some WoW players might be interested in such an invention as well... you know they really hate distractions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting.  I think some WoW players might be interested in such an invention as well&#8230; you know they really hate distractions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
