Comments on: opera + itunes + chrome + ??? = safari 4 beta http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/ gadgets, gizmos, games, cool gadgets for geeks Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:52:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Kimboy http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-29702 Kimboy Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:15:10 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/?p=9556#comment-29702 i really love the layout of Safari 4. the graphics of this browser looks much better than firefox. i really love the layout of Safari 4. the graphics of this browser looks much better than firefox.

]]> By: Troy http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-29363 Troy Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:37:58 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/?p=9556#comment-29363 I love it. (Mac user.) The tabs on the top don't waste space like Chrome's do. I'm all for maximizing the real estate that the window content can use and minimizing the interface. (Though, I am also using MegaZoom, which minimizes even more of the interface.) I'll be using this (in Webkit nightly form) from now on. Troy <a>Get Free iTunes</a> I love it. (Mac user.) The tabs on the top don’t waste space like Chrome’s do. I’m all for maximizing the real estate that the window content can use and minimizing the interface. (Though, I am also using MegaZoom, which minimizes even more of the interface.)

I’ll be using this (in Webkit nightly form) from now on.
Troy
Get Free iTunes

]]> By: Chris http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-29362 Chris Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:32:54 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/?p=9556#comment-29362 I believe this layout will become very popular once touch-screen monitors, which emulate the touch-screen iphone, become widespread and popular. Until then the onscreen movement may be a tad difficult to calibrate. Nevertheless it still impresses. I believe this layout will become very popular once touch-screen monitors, which emulate the touch-screen iphone, become widespread and popular. Until then the onscreen movement may be a tad difficult to calibrate. Nevertheless it still impresses.

]]> By: | acnetreatment http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-29149 | acnetreatment Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:39:06 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/?p=9556#comment-29149 i like the design of Safari 4 but i think it uses more resources compared to Opera. i like the design of Safari 4 but i think it uses more resources compared to Opera.

]]> By: lambert v. http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-21426 lambert v. Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:55:22 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/?p=9556#comment-21426 Hey Aleksey. You're right, Opera did start the tabs-on-top trend; Google just cleaned the interface up. Thanks for pointing it out! Hey Aleksey. You’re right, Opera did start the tabs-on-top trend; Google just cleaned the interface up. Thanks for pointing it out!

]]> By: Aleksey http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-21425 Aleksey Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:48:08 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/?p=9556#comment-21425 I think you forgot that Opera was the one who invented tabs at the top (if you don't count the menu); they've had it for years and everybody just ignored it even though it was a good setup until Google figured out it was a good idea and implemented it in Chrome. I guess the rest are starting to think if it's good for Google it's good for me. I think you forgot that Opera was the one who invented tabs at the top (if you don’t count the menu); they’ve had it for years and everybody just ignored it even though it was a good setup until Google figured out it was a good idea and implemented it in Chrome. I guess the rest are starting to think if it’s good for Google it’s good for me.

]]> By: Andres http://technabob.com/blog/2009/02/26/opera-itunes-chrome-safari-4-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-21194 Andres Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:51:22 +0000 http://technabob.com/blog/?p=9556#comment-21194 Actually therer's a good collection of add-ons to Safari too. That's why I have this flash box just below your blog post blocked - there IS flashblock for Safari. But I agree - there are a lot more add-ons for Friefox than for Safari. And another thing - you CAN manually add pages to Top Sites. Just drag site icon (from site url field) to the top sites window. (instructions: http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20090224100956157 ) You also missed some important features for safari 4 like the neat website debugging and developing tools. Actually therer’s a good collection of add-ons to Safari too. That’s why I have this flash box just below your blog post blocked – there IS flashblock for Safari.
But I agree – there are a lot more add-ons for Friefox than for Safari.
And another thing – you CAN manually add pages to Top Sites. Just drag site icon (from site url field) to the top sites window. (instructions: http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20090224100956157 )
You also missed some important features for safari 4 like the neat website debugging and developing tools.

]]>