Visit the New Technabob Shop!Get Technabob Daily: Join our Mailing List! | Follow Us: Facebook | Twitter
Awesomer Media Sites: THE AWESOMER | MIGHTYMEGA | 95OCTANE
subscribe to our rss feedsubscribe via e-mailfollow technabob on twittertechnabob facebook fan pageGoogle+follow us in feedly
Follow Us:

Twin-Lens Reflex LEGO Camera Actually Shoots Pictures

by Conner Flynn

I’ve never been enough of a camera nerd to build a LEGO camera myself, but if I did, it would be this Twin-lens Reflex camera, inspired by an old 1950’s Yashicaflex. Carl-Frederic Salicath from Norway built this one and he calls it the Legoflex B1.

Other than the lenses, the viewfinder, and a bit of duct tape, camera is made entirely out of LEGO bricks. Some Technic pieces are used to hold the 120mm roll of film that the camera uses. He even included a rewind lock so the film doesn’t unravel or go in the wrong direction. Carl got the lenses from a pair of binoculars and the aperture is a single Technic piece that has a hole in the middle.

lego_camera_2

It’s a very clever build and Carl did a great job. It looks great, and captures some cool and ethereal looking images. To check out more details of the build process, check out this blog entry. Maybe you will end up making one yourself.

lego_camera_sample_picture

[via PetaPixel via TechCrunch]




Comments are closed for posts older than 90 days.

Our Latest & Greatest Posts...

Millennium Falcon and X-Wing Drones Arrive for Force Friday

Millennium Falcon and X-Wing Drones Arrive for Force Friday

Ants March Around iPhone When it Rings

Ants March Around iPhone When it Rings

Own Your Own Battle-scarred Terminator

Own Your Own Battle-scarred Terminator

Star Wars Wall Décor: A Long Time Ago, on a Wall Far, Far, Away

Star Wars Wall Décor: A Long Time Ago, on a Wall Far, Far, Away

GoBox Raspberry Pi Robot Subscription Kit: Maker 1

GoBox Raspberry Pi Robot Subscription Kit: Maker 1

More from Awesomer Media...

The Awesomer Logo MightyMega Logo 95octane Logo
Win Prizes in the Technabob Shop
discussion by