<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>technabob &#187; apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/tag/apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog</link>
	<description>gadgets, gizmos, games, cool gadgets for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://technabob.com/blog/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>commodore 64 vs. the iphone 3gs: guess who won?</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/26/commodore-64-vs-the-iphone-3gs/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/26/commodore-64-vs-the-iphone-3gs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lambert v.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just plain fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commodore 64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=15653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the arguably unnecessary rejection of the Commodore 64 emulator for the iPhone, Technologizer&#8217;s Harry McCracken &#8211; whose last name would be much cooler if it ended with an exclamation point: McCracken! (and started with Zak) &#8211; decided to pit the iconic Commodore 64 with the future Hall of Famer, the iPhone 3GS, just for&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the arguably unnecessary rejection of the Commodore 64 emulator for the iPhone, <a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/06/21/commodore-vs-iphone/">Technologizer</a>&#8217;s Harry McCracken &#8211; whose last name would be much cooler if it ended with an exclamation point: McCracken! (and started with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zak_McKracken_and_the_Alien_Mindbenders">Zak</a>) &#8211; decided to pit the iconic Commodore 64 with the future Hall of Famer, the iPhone 3GS, just for the heck of it.</p>
<p>The head-to-head serves as a reminder of just how much technology has changed over the years, as well as a rough idea of how freakin&#8217; rich Apple must be: while the old breadbox has a colossal lead in terms of total units sold at 32 million (it was first released in 1982),  a head esploding 1 million iPhone 3GS units were sold on its <em>first 3 days</em> on sale alone. That&#8217;s just insane.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-15654 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/c64-versus-iphone-3gs.jpg" alt="c64-versus-iphone-3gs" width="520" height="394" /></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the start of the list. Funny how the C64 is almost all keyboard while the iPhone has no real keyboard at all. Other interesting facts: there are a total of 50,000 apps for the iPhone. McCracken(!) goes by the official number of C64 apps which is more or less 10,000, but several commenters are claiming that there are up to 100,000 programs for the C64. That seems like a huge advantage, until you realize that the iPhone is only less than 3 years old while the C64 is 27.</p>
<p>Of course the iPhone sweeps the tech specs trophies, but the C64 won lots of love because it offered&#8230; FREEDOM! The William Wallace of gadgets had neither carrier tie-ins nor app approval jujitsu. As one commenter said, if there was an iPhone emulator for the C64 it would&#8217;ve been warmly welcomed and immediately approved, no questions asked, except maybe &#8220;Would you like some cookies?&#8221;</p>
<p>Head on to <a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/06/21/commodore-vs-iphone/">Technologizer</a> for the full list and the flame war. The C64 fanboys (fangrandfathers?) are winning. McCracken! Sorry.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/06/23/commodore-64-vs-iphone-3gs-showdown/">Download Squad</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/26/commodore-64-vs-the-iphone-3gs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>hp photosmart printer has its own app store: print-a-fart apps anyone?</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/23/hp-photosmart-printer-has-its-own-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/23/hp-photosmart-printer-has-its-own-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lambert v.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=15454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HP recently introduced their latest printer called Photosmart Premium with TouchSmart Web (henceforth called PSPWTSW), a name which if stripped of marketing speak actually reveals the printer&#8217;s capabilities: it&#8217;s a photo printer (actually it&#8217;s an all-in-one) with a 4.33&#8243; touchscreen, and it can connect to the web via WiFi. What the name doesn&#8217;t tell you&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HP <a href="http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2009/090622a.html?mtxs=rss-corp-news">recently introduced</a> their latest printer called Photosmart Premium with TouchSmart Web (henceforth called PSPWTSW), a name which if stripped of marketing speak actually reveals the printer&#8217;s capabilities: it&#8217;s a photo printer (actually it&#8217;s an all-in-one) with a 4.33&#8243; touchscreen, and it can connect to the web via WiFi. What the name doesn&#8217;t tell you is that HP is also launching an app store for the printer called HP Apps Studio. I&#8217;m not sure if there are an awful lot of things you can do with a printer and a touchscreen, but I&#8217;ll let developers sort that one out.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-15455 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/hp-web-printer-1.jpg" alt="hp web printer 1" width="520" height="406" /></p>
<p>HP has already secured the support of a few websites that will provide unique services and features available only to future users of the PSPWTSW. For example, users will be able to print USA Today stories straight off the printer&#8217;s touchscreen. Nickelodeon has a bunch of kid-friendly content for print such as word finds, color-ins and mazes. Users will also be able to print Google Maps, coupons, and even movie tickets. Neat.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-15456 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/hp-web-printer-2.jpg" alt="hp web printer 2" width="520" height="323" /></p>
<p>The PSPWTSW will be available in the United States come autumn for $399 USD. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5299959/hands+on-hp-photosmart-premium-with-touchsmart-web">Gizmodo</a> was able to procure a test unit, and while they thought that the hardware is topnotch, they came upon the logical conclusion that the things you can do on the tiny touchscreen can be done just as easily &#8211; of not easier &#8211; on a normal computer. Maybe HP should have attached a printer to a monitor instead of attaching a tiny computer to a printer.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.gadgetell.com/tech/comment/hp-intros-hp-photosmart-premium-printer-with-an-app-store/">gadgetell</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/23/hp-photosmart-printer-has-its-own-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
