<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technabob &#187; cpu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/tag/cpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog</link>
	<description>Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Geek Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 20:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Offers Overclocking Warranty for its Processors: Modders Rejoice!</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/19/intel-overclocking-warranty/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/19/intel-overclocking-warranty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacks + Mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overclocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warranty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=80832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a hard-core overclocker ready to grab up a new Intel processor, you will so jizz your pants at this. Intel has announced that it is now offering an add-on warranty on certain Core processors that will replace it &#8211; even if your overclocking kills the CPU. That&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a hard-core overclocker ready to grab up a new Intel processor, you will so jizz your pants at this. Intel has announced that it is now offering an add-on warranty on certain Core processors that will replace it &#8211; even if your overclocking kills the CPU. That means if you give it too much juice and fry your new CPU, you can get a new one free.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-80833" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/pt-plan.jpg" alt="pt plan" width="600" height="275" title="pt plan photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-80832"></span>The way the plan works is that the buyer is allowed one CPU replacement with no questions asked. The new insurance is called the <a href="http://click.intel.com/tuningplan/">Performance Tuning Plan</a> and is valid only on certain CPUs. It is in addition to the normal 3-year warranty and costs just a little extra to get.</p>
<p>If the processor fails under normal use, the regular warranty fixes it. If it fails under overclocking, the tuning plan replaces the part. This sounds pretty cool to me. I wonder if AMD will follow suit. Pricing for the plan varies from $20 to $35 (USD) making this cheap insurance for overclockers &#8211; especially when spending $1000 or more on a top-of-the-line Core i7-3960X CPU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/19/intel-overclocking-warranty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPU Wars: Trump Cards for Techies</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/12/11/cpu-wars-card-game/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/12/11/cpu-wars-card-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek Art + Craft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just Plain Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geeky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kickstarter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=76510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engineer/consultant/card shark Harry Mylonadis has given the classic trump card game a geeky refresh. His new project CPU Wars pits 30 of the most significant computer processors in a battle of numbers, a game which PC enthusiasts already play with real computer components.

In case you&#8217;re not familiar with the&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineer/consultant/card shark Harry Mylonadis has given the classic trump card game a geeky refresh. His new project CPU Wars pits 30 of the most significant computer processors in a battle of numbers, a game which PC enthusiasts already play with real computer components.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-76511" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cpu-wars-trump-card-game.jpg" alt="cpu wars trump card game" width="600" height="450" title="cpu wars trump card game photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-76510"></span>In case you&#8217;re not familiar with the card game, the rules are simple. Each card comes with a set of stats. The trump cards that I grew up with mostly featured airplanes, vehicles or artillery; <em>CPU Wars</em> trades wingspan, horsepower and caliber with stats like clock speed and max <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_design_power">TDP</a>.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-76512" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cpu-wars-trump-card-game-2.jpg" alt="cpu wars trump card game 2" width="600" height="450" title="cpu wars trump card game 2 photo" /></p>
<p>To play the game, each player (up to 6 players can play the game) is dealt a random hand and takes turns naming a stat and whether the contest for that turn will be higher or lower, e.g. higher Max Clock Speed wins. The person with the highest/lowest stat wins and gets the cards of the losers. You lose when you have no more cards. Decks also usually have one &#8220;Super Trump&#8221;, a card with very strong stats and therefore guarantees a win. Of course, you&#8217;re free to make up your own rules if you wish. But my rules trump yours.</p>
<p><iframe frameborder="0" height="500px" src="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/harrymylo/cpu-wars-volume-10-the-card-game/widget/video.html" width="620px"></iframe></p>
<p>You can pre-order a deck of CPU Wars at <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/harrymylo/cpu-wars-volume-10-the-card-game">Kickstarter</a> for $15(USD). I wonder why Mylonadis didn&#8217;t start out with graphics cards. That would&#8217;ve been a more appropriate fit.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://laughingsquid.com/cpu-wars-a-card-game-created-by-geeks-for-geeks/">Laughing Squid</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/12/11/cpu-wars-card-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NVIDIA Tegra 2 Hiding Inside Some Galaxy S II Smartphones</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/03/03/nvidia-tegra-2-samsung-galaxy-s-2/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/03/03/nvidia-tegra-2-samsung-galaxy-s-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tegra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=50641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Samsung Galaxy S II smartphone was unveiled a while back, and the thing looks really nice and has solid specifications. Apparently, some of the smartphones will be packing NVIDIA Tegra 2 under the hood and others won&#8217;t. How can you tell which has Tegra 2 inside before you buy&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Samsung Galaxy S II smartphone was unveiled a while back, and the thing looks really nice and has solid specifications. Apparently, some of the smartphones will be packing NVIDIA Tegra 2 under the hood and others won&#8217;t. How can you tell which has Tegra 2 inside before you buy one? You can&#8217;t.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-50642" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/galaxys2-tb.jpg" alt="galaxys2 tb" width="600" height="451" title="galaxys2 tb photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-50641"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s right, Samsung has opted to use the awesomely fast Tegra 2 SoC inside some of the phones and not others, and they are not telling which devices have what SoC inside. The devices that don&#8217;t use Tegra 2 will pack in Samsung&#8217;s own Exynos SoC.</p>
<p>Apparently, Samsung can&#8217;t make enough of its own product, hence the need for some NVIDIA help. The rub for geeks is that we know the Tegra 2 SoC rocks, but the Exynos is a lesser known, so I personally would rather have the Tegra 2 version.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.itproportal.com/2011/03/02/exclusive-nvidia-confirms-samsung-galaxy-s-ii-tegra-2-design-win/">ITProPortal</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/03/03/nvidia-tegra-2-samsung-galaxy-s-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Gets Half a Clue, Relaxes Screen Limits for Atom N550</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/05/19/intel-relaxes-screen-limits-atom-n550/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/05/19/intel-relaxes-screen-limits-atom-n550/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=33290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years, I have often stood back and wondered when Intel was going to get a clue. Take for instance the complaining and whining the company did about netbooks cannibalizing the sales of its more profitable chips. First off, no one but Intel and its shareholders care if it&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years, I have often stood back and wondered when Intel was going to get a clue. Take for instance the complaining and whining the company did about netbooks cannibalizing the sales of its more profitable chips. First off, no one but Intel and its shareholders care if it makes a profit. The majority of us just want parts that work at a reasonable price.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-33291  aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/atom-tb.jpg" alt="atom tb" width="600" height="400" title="atom tb photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-33290"></span></p>
<p>When Intel strapped its Atom line of processors with a screen size limitation of 10.2-inches I wondered why it even bothered with the netbook segment if they obviously didn’t really want to sell the Atom CPUs. Intel has now got at least half a clue and announced that it would be lifting the screen limits for the Atom N550 CPU.</p>
<p>The CPU is set to launch in the second half of 2010. Makers can now put the CPU into machines with up to 12.1-inch screens. Those machines must run at least 1GB of DDR3 RAM and at least a 32GB SSD or a 250GB HDD. Wait a minute, those are still limitations!</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20100519PD220.html">DigiTimes</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/05/19/intel-relaxes-screen-limits-atom-n550/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac Pro 8-Core Monster Officially Revealed</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/04/mac-pro-8-core-monster-officially-revealed/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/04/mac-pro-8-core-monster-officially-revealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/04/mac-pro-8-core-monster-officially-revealed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple today revealed new Mac Pro workstation models which features up to a whopping EIGHT CPU cores.

Fully maxed out, the systems can have two Quad-Core Intel Xeon 3.0GHz processors, up to 3TB of hard disk storage and up to 16 GB of RAM. Designed with graphics, video and multimedia&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple today revealed new <a href="http://www.apple.com/macpro/">Mac Pro workstation</a> models which features up to a whopping EIGHT CPU cores.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/mac_pro.jpg" alt="mac pro"  title="mac pro photo" /></p>
<p>Fully maxed out, the systems can have two Quad-Core Intel Xeon 3.0GHz processors, up to 3TB of hard disk storage and up to 16 GB of RAM. Designed with graphics, video and multimedia professionals in mind, the new Mac is one serious machine. Some serious graphic card options are also available, supporting massive display configurations such as dual 30-inch monitors and more.</p>
<p>Eight-core Mac Pro systems start at about $4,000, but can go all the way up to $11,000 when you max out RAM and disk storage. If that&#8217;s too rich for your blood, you can always pick up a basic version of the system with dual 2.0GHz Dual-Core Xeons for just $2,200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/04/mac-pro-8-core-monster-officially-revealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

