<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technabob &#187; darpa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/tag/darpa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog</link>
	<description>Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Weird Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DARPA Suppresses Fire with Magic Wand</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/22/darpa-fire-suppressant-wand/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/22/darpa-fire-suppressant-wand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electromagnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinguisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire extinguisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=81080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots of ways to put out a fire, but most of them require some way to actually spray or douse the flames with the suppressant. This can cause problems in small or obstructed spaces. It&#8217;s this limitation that got DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) thinking about&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of ways to put out a fire, but most of them require some way to actually spray or douse the flames with the suppressant. This can cause problems in small or obstructed spaces. It&#8217;s this limitation that got DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) thinking about a novel way to put out a fire on contact.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-81169" title="darpa_fire_suppression" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/darpa_fire_suppression.jpg" alt="darpa fire suppression" width="600" height="358" /></p>
<p><span id="more-81080"></span>Demonstrated in the video below &#8211; albeit on a very small fire &#8211; their system manages to snuff out a flame by destabilizing the fire by playing with electromagnetism and acoustics. While the DARPA program that drove the experiment aims to <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/DSO/Programs/Instant_Fire_Suppression_%28IFS%29.aspx">extinguish fires instantly</a>, this technique does take a few seconds to kill these small methane flames.</p>
<p><iframe width="620" height="379" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TXhdHeNUD1o?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>It&#8217;s unclear exactly how it works, and there&#8217;s no evidence that they could scale it up to put out larger fires with the same technique. Still, it&#8217;s kind of magical how they just wave that little wand over the flames, and it puts them out for good.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.darpa.mil/NewsEvents/Releases/2011/01/20.aspx">DARPA</a> via <a href="http://www.geekosystem.com/darpa-instant-fire-suppression/">Geekosystem</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/22/darpa-fire-suppressant-wand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iOptik Dual-Focus Contact Lenses Could Revolutionize Head-Mounted Displays</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/18/ioptik-virtual-reality-contact-lenses/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/18/ioptik-virtual-reality-contact-lenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Range</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[augmented reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovega]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ioptik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual reality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=80693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These new high-tech contact lenses were developed by the Innovega Technology Manufacturing Lab, and they permit users to focus simultaneously on objects that are close up and far away, which could dramatically improve the ability to use tiny portable displays while still interacting with your real-world surroundings.

The iOptik lenses&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These new high-tech contact lenses were developed by the <a href="http://innovega-inc.com/page8.html">Innovega Technology Manufacturing Lab</a>, and they permit users to focus simultaneously on objects that are close up and far away, which could dramatically improve the ability to use tiny portable displays while still interacting with your real-world surroundings.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-80694" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ioptik-contact-lenses_01.jpg" alt="ioptik contact lenses 01" width="600" height="491" title="ioptik contact lenses 01 photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-80693"></span>The iOptik lenses work thanks to a set of special polarizing filters, which separate high intensity light from ambient light, and a secondary internal magnifying lens, which focuses the light into a single, narrow beam. The light rays are transferred independently to the retina, allowing users to focus on far away and close visuals, in full field of view. These contacts allow you to easily view images on a tiny close-up display (such as on a pair of sunglasses) while at the same time viewing your surroundings without any focus difficulties. The contacts do away with the need for the bulky optics usually found in today&#8217;s <a title="Sony’s HMZ-T1 3D Goggles: The Matrix Isn’t Far Behind" href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/04/sonys-hmz-t1-3d-oled-goggles/">head-mounted displays</a>, and when a compatible display is not present, the contacts would provide normal vision.</p>
<p><iframe width="620" height="495" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/khWE-GYccRg?fs=1&#038;feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Innovega is working with DARPA to create prototypes of these types of lenses and beta test them for the military. A consumer model should also be available within the next couple of years, priced similarly to regular contact lenses.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-80695" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ioptik-contact-lenses_02.jpg" alt="ioptik contact lenses 02" width="600" height="282" title="ioptik contact lenses 02 photo" /></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-80696" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ioptik-contact-lenses_03.jpg" alt="ioptik contact lenses 03" width="600" height="246" title="ioptik contact lenses 03 photo" /></p>
<p>While we&#8217;re still a long way off from displays built into contact lenses themselves, this is a major step forward in improving the usability of portable displays.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2012/01/contact-lenses-1.php">DVice</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/18/ioptik-virtual-reality-contact-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darpa FastRunner Robot: Who&#8217;s the Fastest of Them All?</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/11/28/darpa-fastrunner-fast-robot/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/11/28/darpa-fastrunner-fast-robot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Range</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ostrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=74978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever think that people would make a robot inspired by an ostrich? Well DARPA has those kinds of people and they think that their &#8216;bot will beat all others in terms of speed and stability, thanks to some high-tech wizardry.

It&#8217;s being developed by Dr. Russ Tedrake&#8217;s team&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever think that people would make a robot inspired by an ostrich? Well DARPA has those kinds of people and they think that their &#8216;bot will beat all others in terms of speed and stability, thanks to some high-tech wizardry.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-75011" title="fastrunner_fast_robot" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/fastrunner_fast_robot.jpg" alt="fastrunner fast robot" width="600" height="644" /></p>
<p><span id="more-74978"></span>It&#8217;s being developed by <a href="http://groups.csail.mit.edu/locomotion/russt.html">Dr. Russ Tedrake&#8217;s</a> team at MIT alongside that of <a href="http://www.ihmc.us/groups/jpratt/">Dr. Jerry Pratt</a> of the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IMHC.) The team is working on a new robot that&#8217;s called <a href="http://www.ihmc.us/groups/fastrunner/">FastRunner</a>, and it looks like it should be pretty speedy. In fact, faster than any other robot that we know of. In their computer simulations, FastRunner can already hit 30 mph and they think that it can reach 50 mph without any problems. The main reason why it&#8217;s so fast is the spring-loaded articulated leg design, which only needs one motor to operate.</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/11/28/darpa-fastrunner-fast-robot/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>This means that FastRunner would be light and dexterous, allowing it to jump over obstacles, making it an all terrain robot. The project is part of a DARPA challenge to create a robot that can run more than 25 miles per hour.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.plasticpals.com/?p=30686">Plasticpals</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/11/28/darpa-fastrunner-fast-robot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DARPA&#8217;s Phoenix Assimilates Other Satellites</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=71078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DARPA has had some wild ideas, but any time I hear something from the agency that seems really improbable, I don’t discount them completely. Those cats at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency have a way of making the improbable into reality. One of their latest projects is a satellite&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.darpa.mil/">DARPA</a> has had some wild ideas, but any time I hear something from the agency that seems really improbable, I don’t discount them completely. Those cats at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency have a way of making the improbable into reality. One of their latest projects is a satellite called <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/TTO/Programs/Phoenix.aspx">Phoenix</a>.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-71079" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/phoenix.jpg" alt="phoenix" width="600" height="379" title="phoenix photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-71078"></span>Phoenix is intended to cruise around up in orbit, targeting satellites that have failed. The idea is that on most of the satellites that aren’t working, the issue may be with one small part leaving the main antenna dish, solar panels, and other large parts perfectly functional. The catch is that you can’t just shoot a repairman up into geosynchronous orbit to fix these satellites.</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>This is where Phoenix comes in. This sub-component of a satellite (or &#8220;satlet&#8221;) would find those up there that aren’t working, and link up next to the defunct satellite, detaching defective components, then attaching itself to the working parts to build new satellites in orbit. Phoenix would need to be able to cut through the metal outside of a satellite and reach the sensitive innards to take them apart. The actual disassembly would likely be done by a person on the ground using a telepresence system.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2011/10/darpa-wants-to-2.php">Dvice</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Dynamics BigDog Robot: Will it Eat PIGORASS for Lunch?</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/07/boston-dynamics-bigdog-robot/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/07/boston-dynamics-bigdog-robot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Range</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bigdog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quadruped]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=66386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A reader pointed out that the PIGORASS four-legged robot I mentioned yesterday was somewhat flimsy (I don&#8217;t agree) compared to this more sturdy offering from Boston Dynamics. They call it the BigDog and it will most probably eat your real dog for lunch (it can be weaponized).

Watching the video&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reader pointed out that the <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/06/pigorass-4-legged-robot/">PIGORASS four-legged robot</a> I mentioned yesterday was somewhat flimsy (I don&#8217;t agree) compared to this more sturdy offering from Boston Dynamics. They call it the <a href="http://www.bostondynamics.com/robot_bigdog.html">BigDog</a> and it will most probably eat your real dog for lunch (it can be weaponized).</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-66390" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/090611_rg_BDBigDog_01.jpg" alt="090611 rg BDBigDog 01" width="600" height="402" title="090611 rg BDBigDog 01 photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-66386"></span>Watching the video is somewhat eerie, because you can see Boston Dymanics&#8217; BigDog climbing a forested hill, all by itself. It can carry heavy loads and is powered by an engine that drives the hydraulic actuators needed for locomotion. BigDog is the size of a large dog or a small mule: 3 feet in length, 2.5 feet in height, and it weighs about 240lbs.</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/07/boston-dynamics-bigdog-robot/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>The onboard computer keeps everything balanced. It can run at 4mph, climb slopes up to 35 degrees, walk across rubble and climb muddy hiking trails. It will also walk in snow and water and can carry a 340lbs payload, which is pretty cool.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-66391" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/090611_rg_BDBigDog_02.jpg" alt="090611 rg BDBigDog 02" width="600" height="402" title="090611 rg BDBigDog 02 photo" /></p>
<p>Check out more videos of BigDog in action over Boston Dynamics&#8217; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/BostonDynamics">YouTube channel</a>.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-66392" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/090611_rg_BDBigDog_03.jpg" alt="090611 rg BDBigDog 03" width="600" height="402" title="090611 rg BDBigDog 03 photo" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/07/boston-dynamics-bigdog-robot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DARPA-Commissioned Robotic Hummingbird Takes to the Air</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/02/18/aerovironment-nano-robotic-hummingbird/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/02/18/aerovironment-nano-robotic-hummingbird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool Toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uav]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=49741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I think about DARPA building robots, I envision something along the line of the Terminator or Johnny 5. That isn’t what DARPA has in mind though (at least in this project) as one of its projects has hit the prototype operation phase.


The project is the AeroVironment Nano Air&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I think about DARPA building robots, I envision something along the line of the Terminator or Johnny 5. That isn’t what DARPA has in mind though (at least in this project) as one of its projects has hit the prototype operation phase.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-49742" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/hummerbird.jpg" alt="hummerbird" width="600" height="497" title="hummerbird photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-49741"></span></p>
<p>The project is the <a href="http://www.avinc.com/nano">AeroVironment Nano Air Vehicle</a>, and it looks like a hummingbird. The company says that the micro-aircraft is larger and heavier than an average hummingbird, but weighs less and is smaller than the largest hummingbird in nature. The remote controlled aerial vehicle has flapping wings that provide the ability to hover and fly in any direction the operator wants. Here&#8217;s a video showing the Nano hummingbird in action:</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/02/18/aerovironment-nano-robotic-hummingbird/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>The tiny UAV measures 6.5-inchs wing tip to wing tip and has a total flying weight of 19 grams. That is very light considering the robot has all the hardware needed for flight, controls, a video camera, and the battery. The video that the flying machine shoots can be sent to a remote operator as well. According to AeroVironment, the hummingbird design could someday be used for providing undercover reconnaissance in urban environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/02/18/aerovironment-nano-robotic-hummingbird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darpa Gives New Meaning to &#8220;Brown Out&#8221; With Poop Reactor Idea</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/04/02/darpa-poop-reactor/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/04/02/darpa-poop-reactor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just Plain Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=30873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to college and know firsthand that methane will burn. I once knew a dude that burnt the hairs off his scrotum after a particularly noxious one was lit and flared up unexpectedly. Apparently, DARPA and the U.S. military are looking at a new use for poo. That is,&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to college and know firsthand that methane will burn. I once knew a dude that burnt the hairs off his scrotum after a particularly noxious one was lit and flared up unexpectedly. Apparently, DARPA and the U.S. military are looking at a new use for poo. That is, assuming this isn’t some April Fool&#8217;s joke <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/04/pentagon-wants-troop-poop-porta-reactors/">Wired</a> is playing on folks. I suspect it is a joke. At least I hope it is.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-30874  aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/hankey-tb.jpg" alt="hankey tb" width="600" height="464" title="hankey tb photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-30873"></span></p>
<p>Still, I am going to write about it because poo is funny and it gives me an excuse to break out a <em>South Park</em> reference. The story is that DARPA has put out a request for info on a reactor that could be powered by feces. This shitty generator would then be used to generate brown power for a several years off the grid.</p>
<p>I know a few parks with port-a-potties around my hometown that could corner the world market on electricity if this generator comes to pass. I can hear it now, <em>&#8220;Oh crap sir, the power is out. Sergeant, have the cook break out the chili and prune juice right away.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/04/02/darpa-poop-reactor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darpa Wants Killer Robots That Help Build Themselves. Great. Just Great.</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/13/darpa-wants-killer-robots-that-help-build-themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/13/darpa-wants-killer-robots-that-help-build-themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=14845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DARPA&#8216;s Self-Explanation Learning Framework (SELF) program &#8220;seeks to construct systems that can participate in their own construction.&#8221; Imagine a robot helping build itself. Who or what runs DARPA these days? Are there still humans in there? Things are moving too fast folks. Let&#8217;s look at the matchup for a sec:&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.darpa.mil/">DARPA</a>&#8216;s Self-Explanation Learning Framework (SELF) program &#8220;seeks to construct systems that can participate in their own construction.&#8221; Imagine a robot helping build itself. Who or what runs DARPA these days? Are there still humans in there? Things are moving too fast folks. Let&#8217;s look at the matchup for a sec: Human fetus &#8211; looks cute/scary/funny, probable source of clones and organs, otherwise defenseless. Robot fetus &#8211; smart, literally heartless, doesn&#8217;t need to be fed, can help complete itself. We&#8217;re <a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1764124">doomed</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-14858 aligncenter" title="self_robot" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/self_robot.jpg" alt="self robot" width="520" height="362" /></p>
<p>The quote continues: &#8216;The system might know the requirements for various tasks in its repertoire, and it may try to perform those tasks to verify functionality.&#8221;  So at the very least, these future robots could be thinking, sensing and moving about as they are being built, testing their parts. Which could include what, guns, missiles, lasers?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/terminators.jpg" alt="terminators" width="520" height="394" title="terminators photo" /></p>
<p>DARPA recently held a <a href="https://www.fbo.gov/download/75f/75f2feb2791147d4e9a32c0df13e1d01/SELF_Industry_Day_Announcement,_May_28.pdf">convention</a> (pdf) of evil, traitorous mad scientists to help with SELF. Well I think that this is future future technology.  First of all you&#8217;d either need to have versatile parts or a factory with all the parts that robots need for it to be able to build itself based on its programmed tasks. And second, I&#8217;m scared. Dammit why can&#8217;t DARPA setup programs that make us feel better?</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/02/darpa_self_industry_day/">The Register</a> via <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10255370-1.html">Crave</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/13/darpa-wants-killer-robots-that-help-build-themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

