<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technabob &#187; os</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/tag/os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog</link>
	<description>Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Weird Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:00:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Xi3 ChromiumPC Runs Chrome OS in a Tiny Box</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/30/xi3-chromiumpc-chrome-os-pc/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/30/xi3-chromiumpc-chrome-os-pc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Range</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromiumpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small form factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xi3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=57357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From some reason, I like small desktop computers, not that I have one, but I find the concept useful and want to have them everywhere so that I can slave them into some kind of personal mini-botnet. The ChromiumPC is a modular computer and is the first &#8220;desktop&#8221; designed to&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From some reason, I like small desktop computers, not that I have one, but I find the concept useful and want to have them everywhere so that I can slave them into some kind of personal mini-botnet. The ChromiumPC is a modular computer and is the first &#8220;desktop&#8221; designed to run Google&#8217;s Chrome OS.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-57359" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/052911_rg_ChromiumPC_01.jpg" alt="052911 rg ChromiumPC 01" width="600" height="507" title="052911 rg ChromiumPC 01 photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-57357"></span>Can it still be called a desktop if it fits in your hand? My guess is no. This &#8220;palmtop(?)&#8221; is made out of laptop parts so that its form factor remains tiny. These computers are made out of 3 components: the processor module, the primary I/O module, and the secondary module. The processor module holds the processor and the RAM, the primary I/O has the ports and coms, while the secondary module has Ethernet, video, and power connections.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-57360" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/052911_rg_ChromiumPC_02.jpg" alt="052911 rg ChromiumPC 02" width="600" height="285" title="052911 rg ChromiumPC 02 photo" /></p>
<p>These mini computers were previously made to work with Windows, Linux, Unix, Ubuntu, and other open source-based OS. Now they will support the Chrome OS. The ChromiumPC&#8217;s price will be announced later this year, and it&#8217;s supposed to be available in the second half of 2011. It will be available in different colors, and yes, there&#8217;s even a chrome-plated version.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-57361" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/052911_rg_ChromiumPC_03.jpg" alt="052911 rg ChromiumPC 03" width="600" height="557" title="052911 rg ChromiumPC 03 photo" /></p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110520006214/en/Xi3-Corporation-Announces-ChromiumPC-Modular-Computer-%E2%80%93">Businesswire</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/30/xi3-chromiumpc-chrome-os-pc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chromebooks for $20/Month: Revolutionary, or Just Financing?</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/11/google-chromebooks-20-dollars-month/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/11/google-chromebooks-20-dollars-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 02:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Range</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=55888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google just announced something that&#8217;s been rumored for a few weeks. They&#8217;re going to be releasing a paid subscription model for their Chromebooks, which are laptop computers from Samsung and Acer loaded with the Chrome OS. Prices start out at $20 per month for educational clients and $28 per month&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google just announced something that&#8217;s been rumored for a few weeks. They&#8217;re going to be releasing a paid subscription model for their Chromebooks, which are laptop computers from Samsung and Acer loaded with the Chrome OS. Prices start out at $20 per month for educational clients and $28 per month for enterprise users.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-55889" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/051111_rg_GoogleChromebook_01.jpg" alt="051111 rg GoogleChromebook 01" width="600" height="332" title="051111 rg GoogleChromebook 01 photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-55888"></span>It&#8217;s worth noting that customers will have to sign a 3-year contract to get these machines at this monthly price. This makes it sound a lot like financing to me. At that price, the overall cost of these laptops is significantly higher than a if you just bought them outright. The only real benefit is that troubleshooting warranty is included at this price. Overall, for businesses, it depends on how many computers you&#8217;ll end up buying and if it makes sense for the bottom line. It might work well for certain types of businesses and for people who don&#8217;t want to deal with the hassle of maintaining a laptop.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-55890" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/051111_rg_GoogleChromebook_02.jpg" alt="051111 rg GoogleChromebook 02" width="600" height="414" title="051111 rg GoogleChromebook 02 photo" /></p>
<p>The Chromebooks include the Samsung Series 5, which comes with a dual-core 1.66GHz Intel Atom N570 chip, a 1MP webcam, and a 16GB SSD. There&#8217;s an SDXC card reader and VGA out via an &#8220;optional&#8221; dongle. It will cost $429 for the WiFi version and $499 for the 3G version. The Series 5 has got a 12.1-inch screen with 1280×800 resolution, an overall weight of 3.26 lbs, and an improved trackpad, which was the downfall of the <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2010/12/09/google-destroys-chrome-notebook/">Google CR-48</a>. Battery life is supposed to be 8.5 hours. The Acer model is cheaper, starting at $349, but has a 6.5-hour battery life and an 11.6-inch screen.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-55891" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/051111_rg_GoogleChromebook_03.jpg" alt="051111 rg GoogleChromebook 03" width="600" height="384" title="051111 rg GoogleChromebook 03 photo" /></p>
<p>Look for them both on <a href=" http://amzn.to/lTQubN">Amazon</a> or <a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/chromebook">Best Buy</a> starting on June 15th.</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/11/google-chromebooks-20-dollars-month/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.google.com/chromebook/#chromebooks">Google</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/11/google-chromebooks-20-dollars-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome Os Download, Almost Exactly the Same as the Browser</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/11/20/download-google-chrome-os/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/11/20/download-google-chrome-os/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual machine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=23248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curious and/or impatient techies! An early developer build of Google (Google&#8217;s?) Chrome OS &#8211; which was just formally announced &#8211; has been unleashed on the Internet for those who want to take an early early early peek at what I like to call the BrOSer. From what I&#8217;ve read about&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious and/or impatient techies! An early developer build of Google (Google&#8217;s?) Chrome OS &#8211; which was just formally announced &#8211; has been unleashed on the Internet for those who want to take an early early early peek at what I like to call the BrOSer. From what I&#8217;ve read about it Chrome OS basically offers lightning quick start up times and&#8230; the Chrome browser. I&#8217;m sure it will appeal to a portion of humanity, but not to yours truly. Although I know that I&#8217;ll give in and download the damned thing anyway.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23249" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/chrome-os-1.jpg" alt="chrome os 1" width="600" height="423" title="chrome os 1 photo" /></p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/19/guide-install-google-chrome-os/">TechCrunch</a>&#8216;s Jason Kincaid said, you&#8217;ll only need three things to run the OS in your system. First you&#8217;ll need a Google Account ID, e.g. a Gmail account. Second, you&#8217;ll need the disk image itself, which you can either download via <a href="http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/5170843/chromeos-image-999.999.32309.211410-a1.vmdk.bz2.5170843.TPB.torrent">torrent</a> (clicking that link will download the torrent file) or at gadget site <a href="http://gdgt.com/google/chrome-os/download/">gdgt</a>. Finally, you&#8217;ll need <a href="http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads">VirtualBox</a>, a free cross-platform virtualization program, although I see no reason why commercial alternatives like VMWare Fusion wouldn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-23250" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/chrome-os-2.jpg" alt="chrome os 2" width="600" height="410" title="chrome os 2 photo" /></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve tried creating virtual machines before, the steps for installing Chrome OS are pretty straightforward. Just select Linux as the operating system and Ubuntu as the version, then choose &#8220;use existing hard disk&#8221; when asked which boot hard disk to use, next, next, next&#8230; and voila! You just installed the Chrome browser the hard way. Check out the full article at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/19/guide-install-google-chrome-os/">TechCrunch</a> if you want a more detailed walkthrough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/11/20/download-google-chrome-os/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft (Mis)Educates Best Buy Employees About Linux</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/09/08/microsoft-miseducates-best-buy-employees-about-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/09/08/microsoft-miseducates-best-buy-employees-about-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=19543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Best Buy employee recently posted screenshots of what he claims is part of a training program about Windows 7. The screenshots show some Windows vs. Linux comparisons. You probably know where this is going. The employee is overclock.net forum member GodofGrunts, and here are some of the screenshots he&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Best Buy employee recently posted screenshots of what he claims is part of a training program about Windows 7. The screenshots show some Windows vs. Linux comparisons. You probably know where this is going. The employee is <a href="http://www.overclock.net/windows/569458-microsoft-attack-linux-retail-level-probably.html">overclock.net</a> forum member GodofGrunts, and here are some of the screenshots he posted:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19563" title="windows_7_linux_training_1" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/windows_7_linux_training_1.jpg" alt="windows 7 linux training 1" width="600" height="352" /></p>
<p>Now I have never used any Linux OS, but even if it&#8217;s true that there are fewer major software that are compatible with the system, I am pretty damn sure that there at least 2 Linux apps that provide video chat &#8211; Skype and Pidgin. As for the printer and scanner compatibility GodofGrunts adds, &#8220;I&#8217;ve yet to see a printer that doesn&#8217;t have a driver. You might have to download it from the products website though (gasp!).&#8221; GodofGrunts also adds that there are Linux distros that offer official technical support, contrary to what the table above indicates.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19564" title="windows_7_linux_training_2" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/windows_7_linux_training_2.jpg" alt="windows 7 linux training 2" width="600" height="352" /></p>
<p>I like how Microsoft lists &#8220;Free downloads&#8221; as one of Windows&#8217; strengths when in fact people can legally own a Linux OS for free; same with Linux programs. Is Windows free? Is Microsoft Office free?</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19565" title="windows_7_linux_training_3" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/windows_7_linux_training_3.jpg" alt="windows 7 linux training 3" width="600" height="352" /></p>
<p>Again, I don&#8217;t have sufficient knowledge about software so I can&#8217;t comment on that claim &#8211; note that the training program doesn&#8217;t really claim that Windows is safer than Linux &#8211; but <a href="http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/how-is-linux-safer-than-windows-299953/">this forum</a> lists a couple of advantages that Linux is supposed to have over Windows. If this training program is really being used to &#8220;teach&#8221; Best Buy employees, it means that Microsoft is just breeding technological ignorance.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t they just talk about how Linux systems aren&#8217;t that user-friendly? At least that&#8217;s still somewhat true. The original images that GodofGrunts posted were taken down by Photobucket because of bandwidth limits, but you can go to <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/09/07/best.buy.told.to.misrepresent.linux/">Electronista</a> to see some of the other screenshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/09/08/microsoft-miseducates-best-buy-employees-about-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey N00b, Here&#8217;S How You Install Os X on an Sd Card</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/28/install-os-x-on-an-sd-card/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/28/install-os-x-on-an-sd-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacks + Mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=15785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macworld Senior Editor Roman Loyola posted a video guide showing how one can install Apple&#8217;s OS X Leopard on an SD card. The new Macbook Pros (save for the 17-in) come with an SD card slot, so you can install apps on the SD card and boot from it if&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/141401/2009/06/mwvodcast114.html?lsrc=top_1">Macworld</a> Senior Editor Roman Loyola posted a video guide showing how one can install Apple&#8217;s OS X Leopard on an SD card. The new Macbook Pros (save for the 17-in) come with an SD card slot, so you can install apps on the SD card and boot from it if for instance you want to perform repairs on the internal hard drive. It&#8217;s a very straightforward guide,  a format-this-and-install-that affair, but nonetheless helpful for non-techies.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-15786 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sd-osx-1.jpg" alt="sd osx 1" width="600" height="308" title="sd osx 1 photo" /></p>
<p>Without fiddling with a Leopard installer&#8217;s disk image and throwing some stuff out, you&#8217;ll need at least an 8 Gb SD card to make a portable Leopard installation.</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/28/install-os-x-on-an-sd-card/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t that easy? Now all you need to do is wreck your internal disk so you&#8217;ll have a reason to boot from the SD! I&#8217;m kidding. And before anyone asks, no, you can&#8217;t boot a PC with this card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/28/install-os-x-on-an-sd-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Windows 7 Build on Torrent Sites! There&#8217;S a New Wallpaper Zomg!</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/19/new-windows-7-build-on-torrent-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/19/new-windows-7-build-on-torrent-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=15253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay so maybe I shouldn&#8217;t be so sarcastic; the new build sports significant changes as well. Or should I say &#8220;builds&#8221;. But I&#8217;m getting ahead of myself: Build 7232 of Windows 7 was leaked yesterday, bringing with it improved driver support and application compatibility. Oh and a new wallpaper. Because&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay so maybe I shouldn&#8217;t be so sarcastic; the new build sports significant changes as well. Or should I say &#8220;builds&#8221;. But I&#8217;m getting ahead of myself: Build 7232 of Windows 7 was leaked yesterday, bringing with it improved driver support and application compatibility. Oh and a new wallpaper. Because that&#8217;s what everybody wants from Microsoft: improved wallpapers.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-15254 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/win-7-build-7-7232-wpaper.jpg" alt="win 7 build 7 7232 wpaper" width="520" height="325" title="win 7 build 7 7232 wpaper photo" /></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the new wallpaper; you can get the full version <a href="http://www.neowin.net/images/uploaded/7232wall.jpg">here</a>. But the story doesn&#8217;t stop there;  build 7260 was also leaked yesterday, just a few hours after build 7232 came out.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-15255 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/win7-build-7260.jpg" alt="win7 build 7260" width="520" height="712" title="win7 build 7260 photo" /></p>
<p>No word on the difference between the two builds, but according to <a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/06/16/microsoft-to-rtm-windows-7-this-week-build-7260-leaks">neowin</a>, 7260 is an &#8220;RTM escrow build meaning vigorous testing will commence to ensure this is the final code unless there are show stopper bugs.&#8221; Let&#8217;s hope everything goes smoothly.</p>
<p>Although I have to ask, why is it that Win 7 has been leaked to high heavens, but I&#8217;ve only seen like 3 or 4 Snow Leopard leaks? Does that mean that Microsoft is less strict with their employees? I mean, the release dates for both systems are not that far from each other, so we can&#8217;t say that Snow Leopard is still in it&#8217;s early stages. Hmmm.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/new_windows_7_build_leaks_comes_new_wallpaper">Maximum PC</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/06/19/new-windows-7-build-on-torrent-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to Crash Some Servers: Download Links to Windows 7 Beta</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/01/11/time-to-crash-some-servers-download-links-to-windows-7-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/01/11/time-to-crash-some-servers-download-links-to-windows-7-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=7467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows users, start your browsers. The folks from Sizzled Core are pointing the way! They posted direct download links to both the 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of the beta version of Windows 7, also called Windows Vista Home Business Basic Premium Ultimate We Screwed Up Here&#8217;s The Right Version.&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows users, start your browsers. The folks from <a href="http://www.sizzledcore.com/2009/01/10/windows-7-beta-direct-download-links/">Sizzled Core</a> are pointing the way! They posted direct download links to both the <a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/3/3/633118BD-6C3D-45A4-B985-F0FDFFE1B021/EN/7000.0.081212-1400_client_en-us_Ultimate-GB1CULFRE_EN_DVD.ISO">32-bit </a>and the <a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/3/3/633118BD-6C3D-45A4-B985-F0FDFFE1B021/EN/7000.0.081212-1400_client_en-us_Ultimate-GB1CULXFRE_EN_DVD.ISO">64-bit</a> versions of the beta version of Windows 7, also called Windows Vista Home Business Basic Premium Ultimate We Screwed Up Here&#8217;s The Right Version. We Hope.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-7468 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/dlthisnow_win7.jpg" alt="dlthisnow win7" width="520" height="356" title="dlthisnow win7 photo" /></p>
<p>These links point to ISO images, so once you download them you have to burn them to a DVD or mount them using a virtualization app like <a href="http://www.daemon-tools.cc/dtcc/download.php?catid=5&amp;mode=ViewCategory">DAEMON tools</a>. Also, you&#8217;ll have to get a beta product key if you want to use Windows 7 past the 30-day limit. There are probably ways to get around that restriction without the key, but you&#8217;re on your own with that one. I&#8217;m not Google you know. I can&#8217;t just blurt out links to <a href="http://www.sizzledcore.com/2009/01/11/how-to-get-windows-7-beta-activation-key/">instructions on getting beta product keys</a>.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/01/09/direct-download-links-for-windows-7-beta-iso-surface/">Download Squad</a> - pictures via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/393476/windows-7-will-have-same-foundation-as-vista-be-mostly-secret-until-launch">Gizmodo</a> and <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5077690/get-windows-7s-best-features-right-now">Lifehacker</a>]<a href="http://lifehacker.com/5077690/get-windows-7s-best-features-right-now"><em><br />
</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/01/11/time-to-crash-some-servers-download-links-to-windows-7-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Vista Easter Egg Discovered</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/01/windows-vista-easter-egg-discovered/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/01/windows-vista-easter-egg-discovered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just Plain Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easter egg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/01/windows-vista-easter-egg-discovered/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>[NOTE : This post originally appeared on April 1, 2007, and was an April Fools Day joke. Vista does not include a copy of BOB, but if you scroll down to the comments, one of my readers has posted a link to a download of the original BOB installer if &#8230;</em>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>[NOTE : This post originally appeared on April 1, 2007, and was an April Fools Day joke. Vista does not include a copy of BOB, but if you scroll down to the comments, one of my readers has posted a link to a download of the original BOB installer if you really want to run it.]</em></p>
<p>It turns out that the folks over in Redmond might have a sense of humor after all. I was working on getting my new install of Vista Ultimate up and running on my machine this weekend, and stumbled across this awesome easter egg.</p>
<p>It turns out that there&#8217;s an entire functional copy of the 1995 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob">Microsoft BOB</a> operating system hidden inside of Windows Vista. BOB was supposed to be an easy-to-use interface for Windows 3.2, complete with fuzzy animated characters (who eventually led to &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clippy">Clippy</a>&#8221; the paper clip in Microsoft Office.)</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/bob_large.jpg" title="Microsoft BOB under windows" target="_blank" style="border: 0px none  ! important"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/vista_bob.jpg" alt="vista bob" style="border: 0px none  ! important" title="vista bob photo" /></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I managed to activate it:</p>
<p>First, you need to make sure you have full administrative permissions on your machine. Then, go to the Start menu and enter &#8220;W.0.w.B.0.b.&#8221; (note that those are Zeros not Os) while holding down the Alt key. Then, set your system time zone to &#8220;Cairo&#8221;. The next time you reboot, type in the same phrase backwards and you&#8217;ll be in the Windows Bob environment, complete with all of the original features. Once BOB is activated you can set your clock back to your regular time zone.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the new version of BOB has been updated to include integration with Outlook 2007, so you can actually see your calendar entries and e-mails in the BOB organizer. Post back and let me know <a href="http://toastytech.com/guis/bob4.html">which character</a> is your favorite. Personally, I like Scuzz the Rat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/01/windows-vista-easter-egg-discovered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PS3 System Uses 3x More Memory Than Xbox 360</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/03/26/ps3-system-uses-3x-more-memory-than-xbox-360/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/03/26/ps3-system-uses-3x-more-memory-than-xbox-360/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ps3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/03/26/ps3-system-uses-3x-more-memory-than-xbox-360/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though the Xbox 360 has an arguably much faster and easier to use operating environment than the PlayStation 3, it apparently uses significantly less memory than Sony&#8217;s big black box.

According to this post by Ozymandias (who happens to work for Microsoft,) the Xbox 360 reserves approximately 32MB of&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though the Xbox 360 has an arguably much faster and easier to use operating environment than the PlayStation 3, it apparently uses significantly less memory than Sony&#8217;s big black box.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/ps3vsxbox360.jpg" alt="ps3vsxbox360"  title="ps3vsxbox360 photo" /></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://ozymandias.com/archive/2007/03/22/More-Context-on-Memory-Reservation-Issues-on-PS3.aspx">this post</a> by Ozymandias (who happens to work for Microsoft,) the Xbox 360 reserves approximately 32MB of it&#8217;s RAM for the System, including the kernel, device drivers, Xbox Guide, friends lists, voice/text messages, achievement lists, gamercards, Live Marketplace, 1-1 chat, virtual keyboard, and the music player. That leaves about 480MB of RAM for game developers use any way they want.</p>
<p>In contrast, the PlayStation 3 is <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060413-6600.html">estimated to use</a> about 96MB for System overhead, plus an additional 9MB for friends list functionality. So right out of the gate, PlayStation 3 developers end up with 73MB less available RAM than an Xbox 360 title with the same basic features enabled. Plus, it&#8217;s reported that in-game e-commerce capability wastes another 60MB of RAM. On top of all this, Sony&#8217;s memory architecture says that 50% of all RAM is for graphics, and the other 50% is for application use, further limiting developer freedom.</p>
<p>These memory architecture decisions, along with the reduction in available memory could be part of why cross-platform titles are looking better on the Xbox 360 than on the PS3, especially for games that started on the 360 and were ported to the PS3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/03/26/ps3-system-uses-3x-more-memory-than-xbox-360/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wii Os Front-End Running on Windows</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/02/02/wii-os-front-end-running-on-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/02/02/wii-os-front-end-running-on-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homebrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/02/02/wii-os-front-end-running-on-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some guy with too much time on his hands developed this painstakingly accurate menu system based on the Wii interface, coined &#8220;WiiOS.&#8221;
The menu system is a very faithful reproduction of the Wii menu system, and he&#8217;s got it all tied together with his Wii-mote to let him control some&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/bigjohn8411">Some guy</a> with too much time on his hands developed this painstakingly accurate menu system based on the Wii interface, coined &#8220;WiiOS.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2007/02/02/wii-os-front-end-running-on-windows/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>The menu system is a very faithful reproduction of the Wii menu system, and he&#8217;s got it all tied together with his Wii-mote to let him control some emulated console games on his PC.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Nintendo won&#8217;t be thrilled by the blatant copyright infringement in his design, but maybe they&#8217;ll give him a break and just appreciate the fact that he&#8217;s just a really dedicated Wii fanboy.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://gonintendo.com/?p=12595">GoNintendo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/02/02/wii-os-front-end-running-on-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

