<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technabob &#187; satellite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technabob.com/blog/tag/satellite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technabob.com/blog</link>
	<description>Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Weird Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Earth Smooths Out its Rough Edges</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/28/google-earth-update-version-6-2/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/28/google-earth-update-version-6-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS + Navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=81822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember back when Google Earth first launched. I thought it would be cool to see the planet right from my desktop and immediately went to find my house. The area where I live was so blocky and cut together from so many individual photos that it was impossible to&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember back when Google Earth first launched. I thought it would be cool to see the planet right from my desktop and immediately went to find my house. The area where I live was so blocky and cut together from so many individual photos that it was impossible to make out any detail. If you had a similar experience, it may be time to give Google Earth another go.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-81823" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/gm-tb.jpg" alt="gm tb" width="600" height="478" title="gm tb photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-81822"></span>Google has announced that it has updated the service to version 6.2, and with that update the photos loose their gaps and irregularities, and get a uniform appearance.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-81852" title="google_earth_smooths_maps_2" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/google_earth_smooths_maps_2.jpg" alt="google earth smooths maps 2" width="600" height="792" /></p>
<p>That means now when you view the Earth, instead of seeing a mosaic of square photos plastered next to each other you just get a very smooth and cohesive image.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-81853" title="google_earth_smooths_maps_3" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/google_earth_smooths_maps_3.jpg" alt="google earth smooths maps 3" width="600" height="790" /></p>
<p>The tech used to accomplish this evens out the pics so ones taken night aren&#8217;t so dark and ones with clouds don’t stand out. Google also added the ability to get better search results, as well as added walking, public transport, and biking directions and the ability to share maps via Google+.</p>
<p>You can grab the latest Google Earth installer <a href="http://www.google.com/earth/index.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2012/01/google-earth-62-its-beautiful-world.html">Google Lat Long Blog</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2012/01/28/google-earth-update-version-6-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DARPA&#8217;s Phoenix Assimilates Other Satellites</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darpa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=71078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DARPA has had some wild ideas, but any time I hear something from the agency that seems really improbable, I don’t discount them completely. Those cats at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency have a way of making the improbable into reality. One of their latest projects is a satellite&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.darpa.mil/">DARPA</a> has had some wild ideas, but any time I hear something from the agency that seems really improbable, I don’t discount them completely. Those cats at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency have a way of making the improbable into reality. One of their latest projects is a satellite called <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/TTO/Programs/Phoenix.aspx">Phoenix</a>.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-71079" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/phoenix.jpg" alt="phoenix" width="600" height="379" title="phoenix photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-71078"></span>Phoenix is intended to cruise around up in orbit, targeting satellites that have failed. The idea is that on most of the satellites that aren’t working, the issue may be with one small part leaving the main antenna dish, solar panels, and other large parts perfectly functional. The catch is that you can’t just shoot a repairman up into geosynchronous orbit to fix these satellites.</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>This is where Phoenix comes in. This sub-component of a satellite (or &#8220;satlet&#8221;) would find those up there that aren’t working, and link up next to the defunct satellite, detaching defective components, then attaching itself to the working parts to build new satellites in orbit. Phoenix would need to be able to cut through the metal outside of a satellite and reach the sensitive innards to take them apart. The actual disassembly would likely be done by a person on the ground using a telepresence system.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://dvice.com/archives/2011/10/darpa-wants-to-2.php">Dvice</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/22/darpas-phoenix-assimilates-other-satellites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cookup Solar Barbecue: Like Cooking With Your Satellite Dish</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/07/cookup-solar-barbecue-satellite-dish/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/07/cookup-solar-barbecue-satellite-dish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outdoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=69531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have plenty of sunlight and money to spare? Check out the Cookup, a neat-looking solar grill from French company ID Cook. As you may have guessed, instead of using traditional fuel like coal or gas, the Cookup concentrates the power of the sun to heat food up to 200°C. The&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have plenty of sunlight and money to spare? Check out the Cookup, a neat-looking solar grill from French company ID Cook. As you may have guessed, instead of using traditional fuel like coal or gas, the Cookup concentrates the power of the sun to heat food up to 200°C. The Cookup can be assembled without the need for any tool, and can be adjusted so it can catch the optimum amount of sunlight.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-69540" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/cookup-solar-barbecue-by-id-cook.jpg" alt="cookup solar barbecue by id cook" width="600" height="335" title="cookup solar barbecue by id cook photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-69531"></span>Unfortunately I don&#8217;t know exactly how fast it cooks food. In fact, I don&#8217;t know how fast food is cooked in general. I just wait until my sister says it&#8217;s time to eat. Anyway, ID Cook does say this on its product page: <em>&#8220;Cooking time: 60 minutes Chicken.&#8221;</em> So yeah. No idea.</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/07/cookup-solar-barbecue-satellite-dish/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>I wonder how one goes about retrieving food off of a 200°C surface. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s in the manual, because the Cookup is undoubtedly a long-term investment. You&#8217;ll get savings from not having to buy fuel for it, but you&#8217;ll have to burn a lot of money upfront – the stainless steel and plastic Cookup INOX sells for about $429 (USD), while the wood and aluminum Cookup200 sells for about $715. You can order both from ID Cook&#8217;s <a href="http://www.idcook.com/fr/3-barbecue-solaire">website.</a></p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.notcot.org/post/43507/">Notcot</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/10/07/cookup-solar-barbecue-satellite-dish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA Lays 1-in-3200 Odds That We&#8217;ll Get Pegged by a Satellite Chunk</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/20/nasa-satellite-debris-prediction/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/20/nasa-satellite-debris-prediction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weird Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=67794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all think we can win the lottery even though the odds against us are in the millions to one range. NASA has a massive satellite the size of a bus set to come blazing back into the atmosphere this week. NASA has stated that the odds of a chunk&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all think we can win the lottery even though the odds against us are in the millions to one range. NASA has a massive satellite the size of a bus set to come blazing back into the atmosphere this week. NASA has stated that the odds of a chunk of this satellite hitting some unlucky person on the ground are 1-in-3200. Do those odds bother anyone else?</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-67795" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/uars-1.jpg" alt="uars 1" width="600" height="450" title="uars 1 photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-67794"></span>The satellite in question is the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite or UARS, which was decommissioned in 2005. The last of its fuel is now burnt, pushing the massive 6.5-ton satellite into a lower, decaying orbit that will eventually bring the satellite hurtling back to Earth.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-67796" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/uars-2.jpg" alt="uars 2" width="600" height="779" title="uars 2 photo" /></p>
<p>The rub is that the satellite is so big that NASA figures that this Friday &#8211; when it&#8217;s predicted to enter the atmosphere &#8211; about 26 large chunks (weighing as much as 300 pounds) will make it through re-entry and to the surface below. If you aren&#8217;t nervous yet, NASA has no idea exactly where this thing will land. Re-entry is predicted to be over a 500-mile long area that puts it over populated areas. According to NASA, the chances are high that the pieces will hit the ocean or uninhabited land, and the chances of any one of us being hit are slim, but I still don&#8217;t like those odds.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.space.com/12999-dead-nasa-satellite-falling-earth-sept-23.html">Space.com</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/09/20/nasa-satellite-debris-prediction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seagate GoFlex Satellite External Hard Drive Goes Wireless for iPad Streaming</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/17/seagate-goflex-satellite-external-hard-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/17/seagate-goflex-satellite-external-hard-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Range</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=56360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seagate just released information about the upcoming GoFlex Satellite external hard drive, the first hard drive to include a battery pack and WiFi, allowing you to stream data off the 500 GB drive onto your iPad or other mobile device without the need for wires.

WiFi allows the little drive&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seagate just released information about the upcoming <a href="http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/external/external-hard-drive/goflex-satellite">GoFlex Satellite</a> external hard drive, the first hard drive to include a battery pack and WiFi, allowing you to stream data off the 500 GB drive onto your iPad or other mobile device without the need for wires.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-56361" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/051611_rg_SeagateGoFlex_01.jpg" alt="051611 rg SeagateGoFlex 01" width="600" height="463" title="051611 rg SeagateGoFlex 01 photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-56360"></span>WiFi allows the little drive to create its own wireless hotspot to stream  media to your iPad. It can make up to three simultaneous connections up to 150 feet  away. The drive can work continuously for 5 hours or 25 hours in standby  mode. Expect to get a mix between those to numbers for common usage.  Seagate designed an iPad app specifically for this drive, while other mobile devices can access files using a web browser.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-56362" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/051611_rg_SeagateGoFlex_02.jpg" alt="051611 rg SeagateGoFlex 02" width="600" height="516" title="051611 rg SeagateGoFlex 02 photo" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re tired about how much storage you&#8217;ve got on your tablet, and  want the perfect hard drive companion, then look no further. I don&#8217;t  know why it took so long for this type of device to be released, but look  for other manufacturers to jump on the bandwagon at some point.</p>
<p>The  GoFlex Satellite will cost $200 and will be released this July.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/external/external-hard-drive/goflex-satellite">Seagate</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/05/17/seagate-goflex-satellite-external-hard-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA Studying Ground Laser for Orbital Clean Up</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/03/15/nasa-laser-space-junk-clean-up/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/03/15/nasa-laser-space-junk-clean-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=51552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NASA is tired of all that space junk that&#8217;s orbiting our planet. The myriad of broken satellites and other junk orbiting poses a hazard to functioning satellites that are in orbit. A tiny little chunk of anything traveling at orbital speeds is enough to destroy a satellite and possibly harm&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASA is tired of all that space junk that&#8217;s orbiting our planet. The myriad of broken satellites and other junk orbiting poses a hazard to functioning satellites that are in orbit. A tiny little chunk of anything traveling at orbital speeds is enough to destroy a satellite and possibly harm any spacecraft or astronauts that are in the way.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-51553" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/nasa-laser-plan.jpg" alt="nasa laser plan" width="600" height="349" title="nasa laser plan photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-51552"></span>NASA scientists are now <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1690">conducting a study</a> that Dr. Evil would approve of. They&#8217;re looking at the possibility of using a ground-based laser to clean up the debris. The space agency says that about 60% of the junk orbiting the Earth right now that threatens satellites like the ESA Earth observing satellite can be traced back to the Chinese military test of an anti-satellite weapon and the collision between the Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 satellites.</p>
<p>They would use a medium-powered (5kW) laser on Earth to track and then fire at the orbiting debris. The laser wouldn&#8217;t burn the debris up itself or attempt to directly destroy it. However, the scientists reckon the laser will slow the down the debris&#8217; orbit enough so that it will fall back into the atmosphere and burn up before hitting the ground. The system may even be able to maneuver satellites from the ground with the satellite needing no propulsion of its own.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/26512/?ref=rss">TechnologyReview</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2011/03/15/nasa-laser-space-junk-clean-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ford MyKey Blocks Explicit Satellite Radio Content, Kills Teenage Angst</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/12/29/ford-mykey-blocks-explicit-satellite-radio-content/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/12/29/ford-mykey-blocks-explicit-satellite-radio-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=46086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did some really stupid stuff behind the wheel of a car when I was a teen. My cousin and I used to play car tag where the goal was to rear end the other car. Thankfully, I have grown up a bit since then. I also used to drive&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did some really stupid stuff behind the wheel of a car when I was a teen. My cousin and I used to play car tag where the goal was to rear end the other car. Thankfully, I have grown up a bit since then. I also used to drive with the music up so loud that there was no chance of hearing an ambulance or fire truck behind me and I would often drive well over the speed limit.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-46087  aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/mykey-tb.jpg" alt="mykey tb" width="600" height="450" title="mykey tb photo" /></p>
<p><span id="more-46086"></span></p>
<p>Since I did just about everything you are not supposed to do behind the wheel as a teen, I know what to watch out for in the future when my kids are able to drive. <a href="http://www.ford.com">Ford</a> has a new feature for its MyKey system that already takes some of the ability for a teen to break the law out of the equation; I really needed this as a kid.</p>
<p>The system can now block explicit content on the satellite radio service when the programmed key is installed. MyKey already has the ability to mute the radio until seat belts are fastened, limit the radio volume, and speed limit the vehicle as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/12/29/ford-mykey-blocks-explicit-satellite-radio-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia to Spend $2b to Clean Up Space Junk by Knocking Old Satellites Out of Orbit</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/11/27/russia-energia-space-junk-clean-up/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/11/27/russia-energia-space-junk-clean-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=43825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I grew up in the 80&#8242;s, when grownups seemed to talk about the Cold War and how evil Russia was all the time. The Russians were always the bad people in the flicks I watched too. Maybe those old feelings that Russia is full of nefarious sorts are why the&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grew up in the 80&#8242;s, when grownups seemed to talk about the Cold War and how evil Russia was all the time. The Russians were always the bad people in the flicks I watched too. Maybe those old feelings that Russia is full of nefarious sorts are why the thought of Russia&#8217;s Energia space corporation building a &#8220;pod&#8221; that is specifically designed to destroy satellites bothers me so.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-43864" title="space_debris_space_junk" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/space_debris_space_junk.jpg" alt="space debris space junk" width="600" height="480" /></p>
<p><span id="more-43825"></span></p>
<p>The official line is that the pod would be used to force <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris">space debris</a> and derelict satellites out of orbit. The device the company wants to build is being designed now and will cost about $2 billion to complete. Energia plans to have a finished design and have the thing developed and ready to deploy by 2020 &#8211; and in service by 2023.</p>
<p>These satellites would fall back to earth and splash into the ocean or burn up on reentry. The thing that bothers me is that the pod could just as easily knock things like GPS satellites and other things out of orbit if some evildoer wanted to do so.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1705137/space-debris-meh-russias-got-it-covered?">Fast Company</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2010/11/27/russia-energia-space-junk-clean-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dishpointer Augmented Reality iPhone 3gs App Helps You Find Satellites With Ease</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/08/28/dishpointer-augmented-reality-iphone-3gs-app/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/08/28/dishpointer-augmented-reality-iphone-3gs-app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS + Navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3gs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accelerometer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[augmented reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dishpointer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=19027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever try to install a satellite dish? Speaking from personal experience, I can say that finding the right line-of-sight from the dish to the skies can be a real pain in the a$$. Now there&#8217;s a new app coming for the iPhone 3GS that could make satellite dish positioning just&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever try to install a satellite dish? Speaking from personal experience, I can say that finding the right line-of-sight from the dish to the skies can be a real pain in the a$$. Now there&#8217;s a new app coming for the iPhone 3GS that could make satellite dish positioning just a bit easier.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-19028  aligncenter" title="iphone_dishpointer" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/iphone_dishpointer.jpg" alt="iphone dishpointer" width="600" height="547" /></p>
<p>DishPointer&#8217;s next-generation software uses augmented reality technology to overlay the exact position of the satellites on the live video from your iPhone. The application takes full advantage of the iPhone 3GS built-in compass, GPS, and accelerometer to show you the locations of the satellites in the sky. Check out the video below to see a preview of the application in action:</p>
<p><a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2009/08/28/dishpointer-augmented-reality-iphone-3gs-app/"><strong>Click to View Embedded Video Clip</strong></a></p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have no excuse for those pesky tree branches or leaves getting in the way of your mega 5-LNB high-def dish with this app in hand. And if you&#8217;re a satellite dish installer, you&#8217;ll definitely want this in your bag of tricks when it&#8217;s released.</p>
<p>DishPointer hasn&#8217;t revealed when the new augmented reality app will hit, but says it should coincide with the release of iPhone OS 3.1 (rumored to be in September). For now, you can check out DishPointer&#8217;s other satellite pointing apps <a href="http://www.dishpointer.com/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/08/28/dishpointer-augmented-reality-iphone-3gs-app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elgato Eyetv Sat: Watch 1080p Satellite Tv on Your Computer&#8230; if You have a Satellite Dish</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/07/01/elgato-eyetv-satwatch-1080p-satellite-tv-on-your-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/07/01/elgato-eyetv-satwatch-1080p-satellite-tv-on-your-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elgato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hi def]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=15933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elgato&#8217;s EyeTV Sat captures DVB-S and DVB-S2 satellite transmissions and enables playback on a computer, allowing you to record, export and even share recorded broadcasts over a network of computers. As long as you have a satellite dish. Aside from receiving free satellite transmissions, the EyeTV Sat also has a&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elgato&#8217;s EyeTV Sat captures DVB-S and DVB-S2 satellite transmissions and enables playback on a computer, allowing you to record, export and even share recorded broadcasts over a network of computers. As long as you have a satellite dish. Aside from receiving free satellite transmissions, the EyeTV Sat also has a CI card slot for Pay TV subscribers and can also be used with Pay TV smartcards that support third-party CI receivers. If none of this makes sense to you, well we&#8217;re on the same boat; I think the EyeTV Sat is primarily for European customers.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-15934" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/elgato-eyetv-1.jpg" alt="elgato eyetv 1" width="600" height="365" title="elgato eyetv 1 photo" /></p>
<p>The EyeTV Sat records in lossless <span>MPEG</span>-2/H.264, regardless if the original broadcast was in HD or in standard definition. Recorded broadcasts can be exported to iTunes and then loaded into iPods.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-15935" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/elgato-eyetv-2.jpg" alt="elgato eyetv 2" width="600" height="395" title="elgato eyetv 2 photo" /></p>
<p>The EyeTV has both Mac and Windows versions and is available at Elgato&#8217;s <a href="http://www.elgato.com/elgato/int/mainmenu/products/tuner/EyeTV-Sat/product1.en.html">website</a> for £180 ($300 USD). Weirdly enough, the price of the EyeTV Sat in euros is €200, which is a bit cheaper when converted to dollars &#8211; $282. Either that or <a href="http://www.google.com.ph/search?hl=tl&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=180+gbp+in+usd&amp;btnG=Maghanap&amp;meta=">Google</a> is <a href="http://www.google.com.ph/search?hl=tl&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=200+euros+in+usd&amp;btnG=Maghanap&amp;meta=">wrong</a>.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/news.phtml/25188/elgato-offers-1080p-eyetv-sat.phtml">Pocket-lint</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/07/01/elgato-eyetv-satwatch-1080p-satellite-tv-on-your-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything but the Kitchen Sink: Xstreamhd to Beam 1080p Movies, Music, HDTV &amp; Games via Satellite</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/04/28/xstreamhd-high-def-streaming/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/04/28/xstreamhd-high-def-streaming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Varias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dts hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=12130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can imagine how a streaming service can send movies, HDTV, and high-quality music to homes, but games as well? Hmmm. That&#8217;s what XStreamHD claim they will provide, apparently via Care Bear satellite beams.

Seriously though, XStreamHD&#8217;s got a lot on their hands, and I&#8217;m not just talking about their&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can imagine how a streaming service can send movies, HDTV, and high-quality music to homes, but games as well? Hmmm. That&#8217;s what <a href="http://www.xstreamhd.com/">XStreamHD</a> claim they will provide, apparently via Care Bear satellite beams.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-12131 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/xstreamhd-1.jpg" alt="xstreamhd 1" width="520" height="267" title="xstreamhd 1 photo" /></p>
<p>Seriously though, XStreamHD&#8217;s got a lot on their hands, and I&#8217;m not just talking about their patent-pending technologies. One, the company claims that they will be able to provide their customers with movies even before DVD-copies become available. (Sorta like torrenting, but in a legal &amp; paid manner). Two, the service claims to work its HD magic by pre-fetching content at resolutions up to 1080p with DTS-HD 7.1 Master Audio tracks.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-12151 aligncenter" title="xstream_hd_receiver" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/xstream_hd_receiver.jpg" alt="xstream hd receiver" width="520" height="247" /></p>
<p>Three, XStreamHD claims that their software can &#8220;learn&#8221; user preferences so that it can predict and select future content for the user. Four- and this is where I need some enlightenment that <a href="http://www.xstreamhd.com/howdoesitwork.html">XStream&#8217;s introductory video</a> unfortunately did not provide &#8211; XStreamHD claims that they will stream <em>games</em>. What kind of games? Will these be tied to current consoles or *gasp* standalone games?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-12132 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/xstreamhd-2.jpg" alt="xstreamhd 2" width="520" height="159" title="xstreamhd 2 photo" /></p>
<p>What we do know <a href="http://www.xstreamhd.com/pdf/Brochure.pdf">right now</a> (pdf brochure) is that the basic XStreamHD set-up requires a satellite and <a href="http://www.xstreamhd.com/product_server_overview.html">server</a> (up to 2 TB internal storage; expansion via eSATA available) for receiving and archiving the media that customers select and a <a href="http://www.xstreamhd.com/product_receiver_overview.html">media receiver</a> connected to a TV to access the downloaded content. But if you own a DLNA-compatible device such as an HDTV, Blu-ray player, a PS3 or Xbox 360,  then those can be used in place of the Media Receiver to watch or listen to the downloaded stuff.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-12133 aligncenter" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/xstreamhd-3.jpg" alt="xstreamhd 3" width="520" height="49" title="xstreamhd 3 photo" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s still too early to tell if XStreamHD can pull this off or not, but I think we can all of this &#8211; hardware, software, &amp; streaming service &#8211; to be anything but cheap. What do you guys think? Is it possible? Guess I&#8217;ll have to be content with my XtremelyPlainSD 21&#8243; TV and its XtremelyAnalog Indoor Antenna for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2009/04/28/xstreamhd-high-def-streaming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sqish: Camouflage Satellite Dish</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/06/23/sqish-camouflage-satellite-dish/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/06/23/sqish-camouflage-satellite-dish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camouflage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disguise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/?p=2628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you drive down the average city street, you&#8217;ll see scads of ugly satellite dishes protruding from the side walls, balconies and roofs of homes like some sort of convex grey metal virus. So it was only a matter of time before someone would come up with a way to&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you drive down the average city street, you&#8217;ll see scads of ugly satellite dishes protruding from the side walls, balconies and roofs of homes like some sort of convex grey metal virus. So it was only a matter of time before someone would come up with a way to do away with all those unsightly dishes.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2629" title="sqish_camouflage_satellite_dish" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/sqish_camouflash_satellite_.jpg" alt="sqish camouflash satellite " width="520" height="456" /></p>
<p>The oddly-named Sqish (I know, a &#8216;Q&#8217; with no &#8216;U&#8217;) conceals a satellite antenna inside a compact rectangular box, which can be covered with a camouflage weatherproof label to help it blend into its surroundings. What&#8217;s really cool is that you can actually send a digital photo of your surroundings to the Sqish folks, and they&#8217;ll make a custom camo sticker to make it blend in perfectly to your environs.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2630" title="sqish_camouflage_dish" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/sqish_camouflage_dish.jpg" alt="sqish camouflage dish" width="520" height="218" /></p>
<p>At this point, Sqish satellite antennae are only available for UK satellite customers using services such as Sky or Freesat. Hopefully, they&#8217;ll work up a version for Dish or DirecTV at some point.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2631" title="sqish_camouflage_dish2" src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/sqish_camouflage_dish2.jpg" alt="sqish camouflage dish2" width="520" height="259" /></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re fortunate enough to be in the UK, be prepared to drop £149 (appx. $294 US) for the antenna, and another £25 (appx. $49 US) for each custom matte photo sticker.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.sqish.co.uk">Sqish</a> via <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1025007/Chameleon-TV-The-invisible-satellite-dish-blends-brickwork.html">Daily Mail</a> via <a href="http://www.unplggd.com/unplggd/look/the-sqish-satellite-dish-camouflage-053110">Unplggd</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2008/06/23/sqish-camouflage-satellite-dish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gps Goes Postal: Could Help Solve Usps Delivery Woes</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/11/24/gps-goes-postal-could-help-solve-usps-delivery-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/11/24/gps-goes-postal-could-help-solve-usps-delivery-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GPS + Navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange + Wonderful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/11/24/gps-goes-postal-could-help-solve-usps-delivery-woes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This new device was commissioned by the United States Postal Service in order to hunt down some of the inefficiencies in their mail delivery process. Developed by California&#8217;s TrackingTheWorld, the gadget is slipped inside of a letter, and tracks the precise journey of an individual piece of mail.

The LetterLogger&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new device was commissioned by the United States Postal Service in order to hunt down some of the inefficiencies in their mail delivery process. Developed by California&#8217;s <a href="http://trackingtheworld.com/letterlogger.htm">TrackingTheWorld</a>, the gadget is slipped inside of a letter, and tracks the precise journey of an individual piece of mail.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/gps_letter_logger.jpg" alt="gps letter logger"  title="gps letter logger photo" /></p>
<p>The LetterLogger is small enough to be concealed inside of a standard #10 business envelope, yet contains sophisticated GPS and motion-sensing technology which can record every movement along the letter&#8217;s travels. Not only can it record the precise position and timing of each location, but its motion sensors can detect the amount of time when the letter is sitting still, which could help ferret out wasted time during the delivery process.</p>
<p>They should slap one of these directly on every mail carrier too. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see some delays at the neighborhood bar, donut shop and strip club.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/21/gps-letter-logger-promises-to-keep-tabs-on-mail/">Engadget</a> via <a href="http://www.navigadget.com/index.php/2007/11/23/gll-1000-gps-letter-logger/">NaviGadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/11/24/gps-goes-postal-could-help-solve-usps-delivery-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giant Bug Eye Satellite Camera Could Capture an Entire City</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/27/giant-bug-eye-satellite-camera-could-capture-an-entire-city/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/27/giant-bug-eye-satellite-camera-could-capture-an-entire-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigapixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of alabama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/27/giant-bug-eye-satellite-camera-could-capture-an-entire-city/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Satellite imagery has become part of our everyday lives through applications like Google Maps. However, the current technology involves capturing tons of high-resolution images and stitching them together to form one larger image. This not only creates a huge amount of work to precisely align these images, it also leaves&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satellite imagery has become part of our everyday lives through applications like <a href="http://maps.google.com">Google Maps</a>. However, the current technology involves capturing tons of high-resolution images and stitching them together to form one larger image. This not only creates a huge amount of work to precisely align these images, it also leaves live-action surveillance susceptible to drop-outs as subjects move between cameras (yeah, I&#8217;ve seen <em>24</em> too).</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/satellite_lens_array.jpg" alt="satellite lens array"  title="satellite lens array photo" /></p>
<p>It turns out that a team from Sony and the University of Alabama are working on an imaging system that can capture a huge area with a single camera. The imaging system would actually be built up from a large array of light-sensitive chips, all placed at in the focal plane of a large multiple lens system. The end result doesn&#8217;t look that much different than the complex eye of an insect.</p>
<p>One major advantage of a single camera approach is that near real time images could be transmitted to ground personnel, without the overhead of joining multiple images together. Also, this approach would allow for recording sequential images (the current design could support a rate of up to 4 frames per second).</p>
<p>According to the team&#8217;s recently published <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lmxpo">patent application</a>, the camera could image an area of up to 10 square kilometers from a 7.5 kilometer altitude. The camera&#8217;s gigapixel resolution would allow it to capture images at a precision of up to 50 centimeters per pixel from that height.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blog/invention/2007/09/wide-angled-gigapixel-satellite.html">New Scientist</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/27/giant-bug-eye-satellite-camera-could-capture-an-entire-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directv New HD Channels Begin to Roll Out</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/26/directv-new-hd-channels-begin-to-roll-out/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/26/directv-new-hd-channels-begin-to-roll-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hr20 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/26/directv-new-hd-channels-begin-to-roll-out/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news for DirecTV subscribers. The satellite provider today launched 21 new high definition channels for your viewing enjoyment. The channels are the first wave of programming for DirecTV&#8217;s 100 HD channel promise.

The initial 21 channels are available immediately if you&#8217;re signed up for the HD package and have&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for DirecTV subscribers. The satellite provider today launched 21 new high definition channels for your viewing enjoyment. The channels are the first wave of programming for DirecTV&#8217;s <a href="http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/global/contentPageNR.jsp?assetId=P4360042&amp;CMP=ILC-Q407-RHR-100HD">100 HD channel promise</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/directv_hd100.jpg" alt="directv hd100"  title="directv hd100 photo" /></p>
<p>The initial 21 channels are available immediately if you&#8217;re signed up for the HD package and have the SD version of the channel in your current programming plan. Here&#8217;s the list of what&#8217;s live today:</p>
<ol>
<li>A&amp;E (Channel 265)</li>
<li>Animal Planet (Channel 282)</li>
<li>Big Ten Network (Channel 220)</li>
<li>CNN (Channel 202)</li>
<li>The Discovery Channel (Channel 278)</li>
<li>The History Channel (Channel 269)</li>
<li>The Movie Channel East (Channel 544)</li>
<li>NFL Network (Channel 212)</li>
<li>Showtime West (Channel 540)</li>
<li>Showtime too (Channel 538)</li>
<li>The Smithsonian Channel (Channel 267)</li>
<li>The Science Channel (Channel 284)</li>
<li>Starz Comedy (Channel 519)</li>
<li>Starz East (Channel 522)</li>
<li>Starz West (Channel 540)</li>
<li>Starz Edge (Channel 520)</li>
<li>Starz Kids and Family (Channel 518)</li>
<li>TBS (Channel 247)</li>
<li>TLC (Channel 280)</li>
<li>Versus / The Golf Channel (Channel 604)</li>
<li>The Weather Channel (Channel 362)</li>
</ol>
<p>To get all the new channels, you&#8217;ll need to have an MPEG-4 compatible receiver (such as the H20 or HR20-700 DVR), as well as a 5-LNB dish and the free B-band converters that DirecTV should have told you about by now. If you don&#8217;t have this hardware, no worries. You should be able to get them from DirecTV for cheap (if not free with a little negotiation).</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re like me, you probably have a custom channel list set up on your receiver. If that&#8217;s the case you&#8217;ll need to go in and edit your list to add the new channels. Otherwise, you won&#8217;t see them. Also, they have the exact same numbers as their standard def counterparts, so you might want to remove the SD ones from your channel list to reduce confusion.</p>
<p>In addition to these 21 HD channels, tons of additional channels are expected to roll out over the next couple of months.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/09/26/directv-launches-21-new-hd-channels/">Engadget HD</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/09/26/directv-new-hd-channels-begin-to-roll-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directv Hr21 Pro HD Dvr Image Leaked</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/31/directv-hr21-pro-dvr-image-leaked/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/31/directv-hr21-pro-dvr-image-leaked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high definition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pvr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/31/directv-hr21-pro-dvr-image-leaked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was over on DBSTalk this morning reading about some fun I was having with my DirecTV HD DVR, when I stumbled across this interesting image.

The upcoming DirecTV HR21 PRO looks like a whopper of a high-definition DVR, capable of recording up to 100 hours of HD programming. The&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was over on <a href="http://www.dbstalk.com/showthread.php?t=96403">DBSTalk</a> this morning reading about some fun I was having with my DirecTV HD DVR, when I stumbled across this interesting image.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/hr21_pro_small.jpg" alt="hr21 pro small"  title="hr21 pro small photo" /></p>
<p>The upcoming DirecTV HR21 PRO looks like a whopper of a high-definition DVR, capable of recording up to 100 hours of HD programming. The recorder is clearly aimed at the high end of the market, with a black, rack-mountable case that&#8217;s perfect for serious home theater installations.</p>
<p>According to the flyer (from the upcoming CEDIA show), the recorder will also feature a newfangled &#8220;Optical HDMI&#8221; port (aka &#8220;<a href="http://www.digital-cp.com/home/HDCP_on_DLI_Specification_Rev1_0.pdf">DLI</a>&#8220;), which will allow for digital signals to be sent via fiber optic cable, allowing for longer runs than regular HDMI. From the front panel, it also looks like it&#8217;s the first DirecTV DVR to support 1080p output. While I&#8217;m excited about the prospects of this DVR, I&#8217;m a little concerned that I don&#8217;t see any over-the-air antenna input on the back panel, which could be a deal-killer for some.</p>
<p>Not much else is known about the HR21 PRO at this point (it&#8217;s rumored to be coming this November, price unknown), but this is definitely one to watch for if you&#8217;re a DirecTV subscriber.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/hr21_hires.jpg" target="_blank">Hi-res Image Here</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/31/directv-hr21-pro-dvr-image-leaked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Speakers From Outer Space</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/24/more-speakers-from-outer-space/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/24/more-speakers-from-outer-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fohenz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subwoofer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/24/more-speakers-from-outer-space/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it just me, or have alien life forms abducted the workers in speaker factories lately? In recent days, I&#8217;ve come across some otherworldly radial speakers, dramatic communication towers, and even some that look like the aliens themselves. Now, here&#8217;s a new set of speakers to add to the intergalactic&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or have alien life forms abducted the workers in speaker factories lately? In recent days, I&#8217;ve come across some otherworldly <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/20/radialstrahler-speakers-dramatic-design-sound/">radial speakers</a>, dramatic <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/21/britz-rosetta-speakers-offer-beauty-no-brawn/">communication towers</a>, and even some that look like the <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/05/strangest-speakers-ever/">aliens themselves</a>. Now, here&#8217;s a new set of speakers to add to the intergalactic fray.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/fohenz_speakers.jpg" alt="fohenz speakers"  title="fohenz speakers photo" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://fohenz.co.kr/product/aqua.php">Fohenz Aqua FA-350</a> 2.1-channel sound system features the requisite blue LED accent lights and comes in either white or black glossy finishes. The satellites and subwoofer look sort of like Apollo spaceship landing capsules to me (or giant Hershey&#8217;s Kisses when I&#8217;m feeling hungry.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m baffled by the specs on these speakers, offering &#8220;RMS&#8221; wattage around 1.2 watts per channel (2.5 for the subwoofer), but &#8220;PMPO&#8221; wattage rating of a whopping 1200 watts. I&#8217;m gonna take a wild guess that the higher number is grossly exaggerated, and that they&#8217;ll sound about the same as any other cheap computer speakers. Still, they do look pretty cool.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re available from Korea&#8217;s <a href="http://www.worldlingo.com/S1790.5/translation?wl_srclang=ko&amp;wl_trglang=en&amp;wl_url=http://dcx.co.kr/item/item_detail.asp?itemcd=000000029026&amp;lcd=02&amp;mcd=08&amp;scd=">dcx design shop</a> for 21,000 KRW  (just about 22 bucks), so at that price I wouldn&#8217;t expect much from these other than looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/24/more-speakers-from-outer-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britz Rosetta Speakers Offer Beauty, No Brawn</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/21/britz-rosetta-speakers-offer-beauty-no-brawn/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/21/britz-rosetta-speakers-offer-beauty-no-brawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subwoofer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surround]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/21/britz-rosetta-speakers-offer-beauty-no-brawn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re in the market for some dramatic looking speakers, and can&#8217;t afford the $50k radial loudspeakers I told you about yesterday, you might want to check out these ones from Britz. They may not be the biggest or most powerful speakers out there, but they sure look purty.
The&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/britz_rosetta_speakers.jpg" alt="britz rosetta speakers" class="inline" align="right" title="britz rosetta speakers photo" />If you&#8217;re in the market for some dramatic looking speakers, and can&#8217;t afford the <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/20/radialstrahler-speakers-dramatic-design-sound/">$50k radial loudspeakers</a> I told you about yesterday, you might want to check out these ones from <a href="http://www.britz.co.kr">Britz</a>. They may not be the biggest or most powerful speakers out there, but they sure look purty.</p>
<p>The Rosetta speakers come in a 2.1 configuration, with two satellite towers and a downward-firing amplified subwoofer. They feature a striking modern case design with sleek curves and cool red LED illumination throughout. Like many other 2.1 systems these days, they feature some sort of virtual surround technology (in this case <em>IHSS: Independent Harmonic Surround Sound</em>), but in my experience, most of these just add a general sense of depth to the soundstage, but nothing resembling true surround sound (Yamaha&#8217;s innovative <a href="http://technabob.com/blog/2006/09/20/yamaha-updates-ysp-digital-sound-projectors/">YSP series</a> excepted.)</p>
<p>Keep in mind that the Rosetta speakers are best designed for use with computer or video gaming setups, since they&#8217;re not all that big. The twin speaker towers measure about 3&#8243;(w) x 11&#8243;(h) x 3.5&#8243;(d) each, while the subwoofer measures about 10&#8243;(w) x 8&#8243;(h) x 11&#8243; (d). Amplification isn&#8217;t anything to write home about either, with the satellite towers running at 9-watts per channel, and the subwoofer delivering just 32-watts of power.</p>
<p>The complete Rosetta 2.1 speaker system retails for just 85,000 Korean Won (about $90 USD) and is available from <a href="http://www.earlyadopter.co.kr/">The Earlyadopter&#8217;s World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/08/21/britz-rosetta-speakers-offer-beauty-no-brawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Dav-Is10 Home Theater: Tiny Satellites, Big Boom</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/05/24/sony-dav-is10-home-theater-tiny-satellites-big-boom/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/05/24/sony-dav-is10-home-theater-tiny-satellites-big-boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 13:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subwoofer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touchscreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/05/24/sony-dav-is10-home-theater-tiny-satellites-big-boom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shipping this July, Sony&#8217;s latest home theater system distinguishes itself by having some of the smallest satellite speakers I&#8217;ve ever seen.

Amazingly the $800 DAV-IS10&#8242;s five tiny little speakers can crank out 50-watts each, which should be more than enough for producing decent levels. In contrast to the minuscule satellites,&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shipping this July, Sony&#8217;s latest home theater system distinguishes itself by having some of the smallest satellite speakers I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/dav-is10_speaker.jpg" alt="dav is10 speaker"  title="dav is10 speaker photo" /></p>
<p>Amazingly the $800 <a href="http://news.sel.sony.com/en/press_room/consumer/home_audio_video/home_theater/release/30181.html">DAV-IS10&#8242;s</a> five tiny little speakers can crank out 50-watts each, which should be more than enough for producing decent levels. In contrast to the minuscule satellites, the system comes with a massive Subwoofer with dual 100-watt amplifier, so you can get your whole house shaking.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/dav-is10_system.jpg" alt="dav is10 system"  title="dav is10 system photo" /></p>
<p>In addition to its audio capabilities, the IS10 has a 720p/1080i DVD player on board with slick touchscreen controls. The system includes Sony&#8217;s BRAVIA Theater Sync for interoperability of compatible devices over HDMI and will offer plug-and-play options including an iPod dock and wireless streamers via a Sony Digital Media Port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/05/24/sony-dav-is10-home-theater-tiny-satellites-big-boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creative X-Fi I600: One Serious iPod Dock</title>
		<link>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/29/creative-x-fi-i600-one-serious-ipod-dock/</link>
		<comments>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/29/creative-x-fi-i600-one-serious-ipod-dock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Technabob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subwoofer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[x fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/29/creative-x-fi-i600-one-serious-ipod-dock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creative has released their latest iPod docking stereo, and this one looks really substantial.

The X-Fi Sound System i600 is a complete 2.1 stereo system, with dual 2-way satellite speakers and a powered subwoofer. The speakers are each amplified at 35 Watts per channel, while the subwoofer offers 130 Watts&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.creative.com/">Creative</a> has released their latest iPod docking stereo, and this one looks really substantial.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://technabob.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/creative_x-fi_i600.jpg" alt="creative x fi i600"  title="creative x fi i600 photo" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.creative.com/products/product.asp?category=4&amp;subcategory=683&amp;product=16160">X-Fi Sound System i600</a> is a complete 2.1 stereo system, with dual 2-way satellite speakers and a powered subwoofer. The speakers are each amplified at 35 Watts per channel, while the subwoofer offers 130 Watts of power for some serious bass. The system features a slick piano black finish, and has a decidedly high-end look about it. It features Creative&#8217;s X-Fi audio processing technology, which provides virtual surround and playback quality enhancement which is said to dramatically enhance the detail and vibrancy of compressed music.</p>
<p>The i600 system ships with a full-size wireless IR remote which can operate the iPod and stereo controls, and can charge your iPod while docked. The X-Fi i600 will be available this May for $599.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/29/creative-x-fi-i600-one-serious-ipod-dock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

