X

EU Visitor Notice: This Website Uses Cookies

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, to provide analytical data to better serve our visitors, and to serve advertising to fund our operations. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Your preference will be saved for 90 days, or until you clear your browser cookies.


I AGREE
I DISAGREE
Learn More
Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Geek Stuff on Technabob
VISIT OUR OTHER SITES: THE AWESOMER | 95OCTANE

Ars Technica Flash Drive Roundup: No Surprises Here

by Lambert Varias
Advertisement

It doesn’t take a genius to predict that over time, gadgets will be cheaper compared to their predecessors, and they’ll have improved performance as well. And that’s basically what Ars Technica’s 5-page 2009 flash drive roundup reveals: today’s flash drives are cheaper and perform better compared to the ones available in 2005. So is the report just a detailed look at the obvious? Yes and no. While the conclusion is a no-brainer, there are several gems of info that us consumers would do well to take note of, because in this case some brands are really better than the others, if only ever so slightly.

ars-technicas-test-flash-drives

Ars’ Matt Woodward tested 8 flash drives from some of the most popular brands available today: OCZ, Patriot, Corsair, Sandisk, Kingston, SuperTalent, and PQI. The flash drives that were tested are in the $9 – $30 USD range; most of them sell for around $20 USD. As I said above, the long and winding road that Woodward took led him to the not-quite-sensational — but nonetheless positive — generalization: flash drives today are of decent, if not excellent, quality despite their low prices.

flash-drive-graph

But the battle of the brands is no Linux vs. Mac vs. PC, where there’s no clear winner: the flash drives with the fastest read/write speeds are those made by OCZ and Patriot, while the cheap-ass Kingston drive came in dead last in nearly all of the tests. The overall winners in price-to-performance ratio were SuperTalent’s $19 USD Pico-B 4Gb drive and SanDisk’s $11 USD Cruzer Micro 4GB drive.

champs

champs-2

Sure, such differences may not be that obvious in actual use, but I think as geekier, more informed consumers we should take note of the brands that are not performing as well as their competitors, and support those that strive to come up with quality products. Since non-techies might not have the patience to wade through articles like this (they may not even know of Ars Technica or technabob), we should take this article as evidence enough for us to spread the word around: Kingston = meh.

Deals in The Technabob Shop



The Pits

The Pits

Death Valley 8K

Death Valley 8K

Paranoid Android Multitrack Cover

Paranoid Android Multitrack Cover

Advertisement
Brabus Mercedes X-Class Adds Style and a Few Ponies

Brabus Mercedes X-Class Adds Style and a Few Ponies

New Mustang GT500 to Get an Automatic Transmission?

New Mustang GT500 to Get an Automatic Transmission?

Ferrari 812 Superfast Hits Nearly 200 mph on the Autobahn

Ferrari 812 Superfast Hits Nearly 200 mph on the Autobahn