Visit the New Technabob Shop!Get Technabob Daily: Join our Mailing List! | Follow Us: Facebook | Twitter
Awesomer Media Sites: THE AWESOMER | MIGHTYMEGA | 95OCTANE
subscribe to our rss feedsubscribe via e-mailfollow technabob on twittertechnabob facebook fan pageGoogle+follow us in feedly
Follow Us:

World’s Tallest LEGO Tower Stands Nearly 105 Feet-Tall

by Shane McGlaun

I could never build a gigantic LEGO creation like this world record-breaking tower. I tend to get bored after building a couple of LEGO cars or houses with my kids. That didn’t stop a group of LEGO fans in South Korea from constructing this 104-foot, 8-inch-tall LEGO tower, breaking the previous world record. The previous tallest LEGO creation stood at “just” 103 feet, 8-inches tall.

The tower reminds me more than a bit of the Washington Monument. The tower is larger at the base in the tip and uses supporting guide wires along the way to keep it from toppling over onto the crowds. The project used over 500,000 LEGO bricks when all was said and done.

Among the builders were 4000 local kids conscribed into LEGO slave labor. By that, I mean the children won a contest and were allowed to help build the massive tower. Don’t expect to see LEGO release this tower as an off-the-shelf kit any time soon.

[via Huffington Post]




Comments are closed for posts older than 90 days.

Our Latest & Greatest Posts...

The Swiss Army Machete Zombie Defense Multi-Tool

The Swiss Army Machete Zombie Defense Multi-Tool

Blade of the Black Swordsman: Not as Dirty as It Sounds

Blade of the Black Swordsman: Not as Dirty as It Sounds

Star Trek TNG Boot Slippers: Warm Me up, Scotty!

Star Trek TNG Boot Slippers: Warm Me up, Scotty!

Legend of Zelda Villains Keyboard Decals: It\

Legend of Zelda Villains Keyboard Decals: It's Dangerous to Type Alone

Pocketbands Let You Carry a Key and Cash on Your Wrist

Pocketbands Let You Carry a Key and Cash on Your Wrist

More from Awesomer Media...

The Awesomer Logo MightyMega Logo 95octane Logo
Win Prizes in the Technabob Shop
discussion by