X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

I agree
Learn More
Great Geek Gifts in the Technabob Shop!Get Technabob Daily: Join our Mailing List! | Follow Us: Facebook | Twitter
Awesomer Media Sites: THE AWESOMER | MIGHTYMEGA | 95OCTANE
subscribe to our rss feedsubscribe via e-mailfollow technabob on twittertechnabob facebook fan pageGoogle+follow us in feedly
Follow Us:
Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Geek Stuff on Technabob

Microsoft’s Project Natick Tests Viability of Underwater Datacenters: Messages in Bottles

by Lambert Varias
Advertisement

Thanks (or no thanks) to Microsoft, someday we could have clouds under the sea. The software giant recently shared details on what it calls Project Natick, an experiment about constructing and operating an underwater datacenter.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_1zoom in

The datacenter in these images is Project Natick’s prototype Leona Philpot, named after a character in the Halo universe. The 38,000lb., 10’x 7′ datacenter recently spent over 3 months off the coast of Central California. Inside it was a single rack of computers, equivalent to about 300 desktop PCs. Microsoft says Leona worked so well that the company actually used it for Azure, its cloud computing business.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_2zoom in

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_3zoom in

Despite the counter-intuitive setup, Microsoft says that underwater datacenters could potentially save lots of time and money. The ocean helps cool the computers, a task that would normally eat up a significant amount of a datacenter’s operating costs. Microsoft also says that half of the world’s population lives within 120mi of the sea, which means underwater datacenters could lead to lower latency.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_4

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_5zoom in

Microsoft also says that an underwater datacenter can be deployed in as little as 3 months, whereas its landbound equivalent could take up to 2 years. Further, terrestrial datacenters are constantly managed by people, but Leona and her potential descendants are designed to be maintained only once every 5 years.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_6zoom in

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_7zoom in

If you don’t need people, then you don’t need a large space and all the other things that people need, such as roads, air, paychecks, etc. On the flip side of the coin, underwater datacenters could one day be cheap enough to be deployed temporarily, such as for disasters or major public events like the World Cup. Finally, underwater datacenters could one day harness ocean currents as a source of power, leading to more savings and less fuel consumption.

Microsoft plans to launch another prototype underwater datacenter that’s four times larger than Leona and has 20 times the computing power. I hope they look into its environmental implications thoroughly. While the company says that the heat and noise generated by Leona was negligible, things might escalate if the datacenters are deployed in large numbers.

[via Microsoft & The New York Times via Engadget]

Hot Deals in the Technabob Shop:



Comments are closed for posts older than 90 days.

More from Awesomer Media...

Octopus Lantern

Octopus Lantern

Crash Bandicoot: N. Sane Trilogy

Crash Bandicoot: N. Sane Trilogy

2018 Toyota Camry Teased, Might Be Good Looking

2018 Toyota Camry Teased, Might Be Good Looking

McLaren 570S Track Pack

McLaren 570S Track Pack

Sideshow Iron Man Avengers Assemble Statue

Sideshow Iron Man Avengers Assemble Statue

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (Teaser)

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (Teaser)

Advertisement