X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

I agree
Learn More
Great Geek Gifts in the Technabob Shop!Get Technabob Daily: Join our Mailing List! | Follow Us: Facebook | Twitter
Awesomer Media Sites: THE AWESOMER | MIGHTYMEGA | 95OCTANE
subscribe to our rss feedsubscribe via e-mailfollow technabob on twittertechnabob facebook fan pageGoogle+follow us in feedly
Follow Us:
Cool Gadgets, Gizmos, Games and Geek Stuff on Technabob

Microsoft’s Project Natick Tests Viability of Underwater Datacenters: Messages in Bottles

by Lambert Varias
Advertisement

Thanks (or no thanks) to Microsoft, someday we could have clouds under the sea. The software giant recently shared details on what it calls Project Natick, an experiment about constructing and operating an underwater datacenter.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_1zoom in

The datacenter in these images is Project Natick’s prototype Leona Philpot, named after a character in the Halo universe. The 38,000lb., 10’x 7′ datacenter recently spent over 3 months off the coast of Central California. Inside it was a single rack of computers, equivalent to about 300 desktop PCs. Microsoft says Leona worked so well that the company actually used it for Azure, its cloud computing business.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_2zoom in

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_3zoom in

Despite the counter-intuitive setup, Microsoft says that underwater datacenters could potentially save lots of time and money. The ocean helps cool the computers, a task that would normally eat up a significant amount of a datacenter’s operating costs. Microsoft also says that half of the world’s population lives within 120mi of the sea, which means underwater datacenters could lead to lower latency.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_4

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_5zoom in

Microsoft also says that an underwater datacenter can be deployed in as little as 3 months, whereas its landbound equivalent could take up to 2 years. Further, terrestrial datacenters are constantly managed by people, but Leona and her potential descendants are designed to be maintained only once every 5 years.

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_6zoom in

microsoft_project_natick_underwater_datacenter_7zoom in

If you don’t need people, then you don’t need a large space and all the other things that people need, such as roads, air, paychecks, etc. On the flip side of the coin, underwater datacenters could one day be cheap enough to be deployed temporarily, such as for disasters or major public events like the World Cup. Finally, underwater datacenters could one day harness ocean currents as a source of power, leading to more savings and less fuel consumption.

Microsoft plans to launch another prototype underwater datacenter that’s four times larger than Leona and has 20 times the computing power. I hope they look into its environmental implications thoroughly. While the company says that the heat and noise generated by Leona was negligible, things might escalate if the datacenters are deployed in large numbers.

[via Microsoft & The New York Times via Engadget]




Comments are closed for posts older than 90 days.

More from Awesomer Media...

theawesomer logo
Xenia Rubinos Live How Is Your Phone Changing You? Lars Von Trier: Deconstructing Cinema Prometheus SHADO Pack 95octane logo
Matech Ford GT1 Racecar Turns up on eBay First Drive Review: 2017 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport Review: 2016 GMC Canyon SLE Diesel BMW M5 Pure Metal Silver Limited Edition mightymega logo
American Gods Teaser Star Trek: Discovery Ship Teased Quantum Mechanix 2016 Spaceship Scale Models DC Collectibles Batman: The Animated Series Batman Expression Pack
Advertisement